Showing posts with label Earth Day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Earth Day. Show all posts

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Stop Lynas group vows to fight on


By G Lavendran. Published by Free Malaysia Today on 20 December 2012.

The Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL), a coalition of non-governmental organisations against the Lynas rare earth plan in Kuantan, has vowed to continue its legal battle against the granting of the temporary operating licence (TOL) to Lynas recently. 

The group said it will go on with its campaign against Lynas despite failing to win its appeal at the Court of Appeal yesterday, against a High Court decision which refused to grant a stay on the government’s decision to award Lynas the TOL. Tan Bun Teet, an applicant to revoke the TOL and a spokesperson for SMSL, said although “we didn’t think we would win the stay on the TOL through this appeal, we had to exhaust this legal avenue to test the court system”.

“We now have three judicial review cases, all armed with strong technical and scientific evidence in court. We will fight till the end to stop Lynas,” he said in a statement. “Radiation and hazardous substances are not something one should be complacent with. Lynas will be producing a massive amount of toxic waste. Lynas has no safe plan to dispose of this waste. Lynas is now at odd with our ministers who insisted that that waste be transported out of Malaysia, which Lynas has declined. Yet the court had done nothing to halt the TOL until the waste management issue has been sorted out,” he added.

Lynas’ suggestion to turn its radioactive waste contaminated with other hazardous substances such as chemical compounds and heavy metals [into commercially safe products] will lead to its toxic waste spreading far and wide, subjecting more innocent public to its hazards. Once again I call on concerned residents and citizens to stand together with us to do something to protect your family, investment and your future in Kuantan and in Malaysia. The government has failed in its duty of care to protect you. The choice is now in your hands to do something to reclaim your safe space here in this country,” said Tan.

Another applicant to the case, Ismail Abu Bakar, said in the same statement that SMSL was disappointed with the outcome of the appeal as the court did not take into full consideration the scientific facts and technical details provided by our experts.

“We have been informed by highly qualified and skilled independent experts that the Lynas project has many problems with pollution and waste management,” he said.

SMSL also asserted that the court has neglected to take into consideration that the two judicial review cases are aimed at nullifying the approval of the TOL. “If these cases succeed, the TOL now granted to Lynas will no longer be legally valid and Lynas’ operation stopped,” the statement said.

Ram Punusamy, a local resident and active Stop Lynas campaigner, said the court did not accept SMSL’s request for the precautionary principle to be adopted to make sure that Lynas has settled its waste management and pollution problems identified by SMSL’s experts.

The application for a judicial review case will be heard in court on Jan 29, 2013.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Ancestors ‘join’ thousands in Pengerang rally



By Leven Woon. Published by Free Malaysia Today on 30 September 2012.

More than 3,000 people gathered at Pengerang, Johor today for the Himpunan Hijau Lestari Pengerang rally against a massive petro-chemical plant, with some local residents bringing ancestral photographs to the scene. Clad in green, the protesters started to gather at Dataran Sungai Rengit since early morning, to the  backdrop of a huge lobster statue at the square entrance.

By the time the rally began at 10am, the squre was packed with protesters holding placards that read, among others, “Don’t wait until our villages are pawned”, “Taiwan treats it as rubbish, we take it as treasure”, “Defend sustainable Pengerang”.

Empty chairs were also placed in front of the stage where 10 local residents later placed their ancestors photographs on the chairs in a symbolic move to oppose the proposed grave relocation. “The authorities always say there are only a few people protesting against this project, but today not only the entire village has come out, we even invited our ancestors to come,” said Gabungan NGO Pengerang vice chairman Sim Seng San.

The residents also carried the photographs to the stage, while some performed brief prayers to their ancestors later. Sim told FMT that it was the residents’ idea to bring the photographs to the rally. “Unlike urban people buying property, the local folks have laid their roots and foundation in Pengerang for generations. “Our ancestors built it for decades, but it vanishes now on an order from the authorities,” he said.

The Johor edition of Himpunan Hijau rally was held today following residents’ opposition to the RM60 billion Petronas’ Refinery and Petro-chemical Integrated Project (Rapid). Besides posing potential health hazards, the residents are also upset over the massive land acquisition plan which will see more than eight villages and 8,094ha of lands being taken up.

A slew of activists such as Himpunan Hijau chairman Wong Tack, Bersih steering committee member Wong Chin Huat, and politicians such as Johor DAP chairman Boo Cheng Hau, PAS vice president Salahuddin Ayub, Johor PAS commissioner Mahfodz Mohamed, central committee member Mazlan Aliman and Johor PKR chairman Chua Jui Meng attended the rally. They led the crowd to break into occasional chants of “Hidup Rakyat”, “No to Rapid”, “Bersih” throughout the two-hour protest.

Meanwhile, Kg Sungai Kapal resident Kasran Dollah, whose home has been earmarked for acquisition, told the crowd that the compensation given was too little as compared to the losses incurred. “They only offered RM2.8 per square feet for agricultural land. If I have one acre of land, I would only be given RM120,000, which is not even enough to buy a house that costs RM150,000,” he said.

He added that the residents would also lose their source of income once their agricultural lands are taken. Johor PKR chairman and party vice president Chua said that Pakatan would close down the Petronas plant if it comes to power in the next general election. The rally ended peacefully at noon, with emcee Hishammuddin Rais leading the crowd to recite Earth Charter, a pledge to conserve the environment.


Related reports:
PKR will scrap the proposed RM60 billion Petronas Refinery and Petrochemical Integrated Project (Rapid) in Pengerang should they come to power after the next general election, said its Johor state chairman Chua Jui Meng today. “Anwar (Ibrahim) has asked me to convey this message to everyone here today, that we will reject the project and rebuild the livelihood of the locals ,” he told the cheering protesters.

Speaking to FMT later, Chua said the decision was made in PKR’s political bureau meeting chaired by de facto leader Anwar recently. He said Rapid will be scrapped alongside with the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant in Gebeng, Pahang.

“I want to warn companies who wish to invest in the Rapid project, even if (Prime Minister) Najib (Tun Razak) gives them license, we will revoke it once we come into power,” he said. He added that Pakatan was willing to incur extra costs to compensate investors’ losses.

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=%2F2012%2F9%2F30%2Fnation%2F20120930145347&sec=nation&utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Pengerang MP Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said the opposition was using the project as a political move to instil hatred towards the government. She added that the opposition had been twisting facts about the project to gain votes. She blasted the protest organisers for saying that she was invited to attend the event. "I did not received any invitation from them. This is the way Opposition works which is lying to the people," she said.

PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub told reporters at the rally that the party never opposed the project but reminded the Government of the welfare of the people in Pengerang.


Wednesday, September 19, 2012

20,000 natives affected by Baram Dam to stay put



By Sulok Tawie. Published by The Sun Daily on 18 September 2012.

Over 20,000 natives, who will be directly affected by the construction of the proposed Baram Dam, will not go anywhere to be resettled, SAVE Sarawak's Rivers Network (SAVE Rivers) president Philip Ngau told reporters yesterday.

He said these natives are from 26 longhouses, above the dam site at Long Keseh, along the mighty Baram River. "A few thousand more natives from the longhouses located downstream of the dam will be indirectly affected," he said on the sidelines of a public forum on dams to be constructed in Sarawak and native customary rights land.

Ngau, whose longhouse, Long Laput, is not directly affected by the dam, said resettling these 20,000 natives will cause untold problems and miseries to them. "Where do these people go?" he asked, stating that the affected natives had not been told where they would be resettled. "Even if they have been told where to go, they have insisted that they will stay put, regardless," he said. Ngau said SAVE Rivers has asked the natives to stay put.

Borneo Research Institute of Malaysia (BRIMAS) director Mark Bujang said that it is unlikely that the government can solve the problems to be faced by these 20,000 affected natives. He pointed out that the problems faced by the people affected by the Batang Ai dam in Sri Aman Division and the Bakun Dam in Kapit Division have not be resolved.

Over 10,000 people, affected by the Bakun dam, have been resettled at the Sungai Asap resettlement scheme, but many have moved out. "The Sungai Asap Resettlement scheme is 50 % empty because many have left to go elsewhere or returned to the original places above the Bakun dam which are not submerged by the rising water," Bujang said.

"There are also others who built floating houses at the Bakun lake. There are 40 families from formerly from Long Jawe living on the floating houses. They have moved out of Sungai Asap," he said, stating that a few hundreds more families planned to build the floating houses at the lake.

Long Jawe is one of the longhouses submerged by the water of Bakun dam. According to Bujang, Sungai Asap is not a place to reside. "The government allocated three acres of land to each family. Even then the land is not suitable for farming because of the nature of soil," he said. "So, you can't plant padi or cash crop like rubber," he added. Bujang said that the state government has not been definite on when the construction of the Baram dam will start.

The RM4 billion dam, when completed, will generate 1,200MW of electricity. The dam will have a catchment area of about 41,200 hectares or 412 square kilometres of forested areas. Sarawak Energy Berhad (SEB), the state government-owned power supplier, is currently conducting comprehensive tests on the stability of the rock structure on the dam site.



Sekumpulan kira-kira 50 Orang Asal dari Baram mengadakan protes di hadapan bangunan sekretariat negeri Sarawak di Kuching semalam, membantah projek mega empangan yang akan menenggelamkan rumah panjang mereka. Mereka daripada 18 rumah panjang di Baram Hulu dan Tengah juga menyerahkan petisyen yang mengandungi lebih 1,000 tandatangan kepada Pejabat Ketua Menteri Sarawak.

Petisyen itu menyuarakan tentangan mereka terhadap rancangan membina empangan mega di Baram yang akan membanjiri kawasan tersebut seluas separuh saiz Singapura, serta menenggelamkan tanah nenek moyang mereka, rumah dan ladang-ladang di situ.

Dalam satu kenyataan semalam, Preiden Jaringan Orang Asal seMalaysia (Joas), Thomas Jalong, yang berasal dari Long Anap, Baram, berkata empangan itu akan menjejaskan kehidupan penduduk asal tempatan.

"Empangan akan pasti menenggelamkan tanah nenek moyang dengan lebih 20,000 penduduk dan dalam proses itu, ia akan mengakibatkan kami kehilangan rumah kita," katanya. Dengan itu, katanya, mereka secara tidak adil akan kehilangan tanah mereka, sumber mata pencarian dan rezeki, dan menghadapi masa depan yang tidak menentu,

Menurutnya, tanah itu bukan semata-mata sahaja menjadi sumber ekonomi bagi komuniti Orang Asal tetapi penting kepada identiti sosial, kebudayaan, kerohanian dan politik mereka.

12 empangan mega dirancang

Sementara itu, Rangkaian Selamatkan Sungai Sarawak (Save Rivers), sebuah gabungan yang dibentuk untuk menentang pembinaan 12 empangan mega yang dirancang bagi Sarawak, berkata bantahan itu diadakan untuk mendesak kerajaan mematuhi Deklarasi Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu mengenai Hak Orang Asal.

Presidennya, Peter Kallang berkata kerajaan negeri Sarawak perlu menghentikan semua kerja di atas jalan akses ke empangan kerana ia sudah pun menjejaskan masyarakat Orang Asal. Malah, wakil Jawatankuasa Bertindak Lindungi Baram, Philip Jau berkata perancangan untuk pembinaan empangan Baram tidak pernah telus.

"Mereka tidak bertanya rakyat pandangan mereka mengenai rancangan membina empangan tetapi sebaliknya telah memulakan kerja mengukur jalan masuk ke projek itu," kata Philip.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Kumpulan Anti-Lynas mahu tahu PELAN TERPERINCI pembuangan sisa, berazam untuk berjuang hingga akhir



Oleh Ida Lim. Diterbitkan oleh The Malaysian Insider pada 17 September 2012.

Kumpulan akar umbi pergerakan kekal tidak yakin dengan janji Lynas Corporation dan Putrajaya untuk menguruskan sisa dari loji nadir bumi kontroversi pelombong Australia di Kuantan, hari ini menuntut syarikat itu mendedahkan pelan terperinci atau “akan melawan hingga saat akhir”.

Dua minggu lalu, Lembaga Pelesenan Tenaga Atom Malaysia (AELB) mengeluarkan lesen operasi sementara (TOL) bagi Lynas Corp walaupun bantahan meluas, berhujah bahawa pelombong Australia itu terikat di sisi undang-undang untuk membuang sisa radioaktif dari kilang dan mengembalikan baki ke Australia. Lynas Corp telah memohon ke Australia untuk “mengimport bahan” dari joji walaupun dasar Canberra adalah untuk menolak sisa radioaktif, kata seorang Diplomat Australia Jumaat lepas. 

Pengerusi Himpunan Hijau, Wong Tack, memberi amaran tegas kepada Lynas dengan mengatakan bahawa: “Melainkan jika anda mempunyai rancangan yang sangat jelas, kita tidak akan membenarkan anda mempunyai apa-apa untuk masuk... Rakyat telah memutuskan kita tidak mahu industri ini di negara kita.”

“Pek dan pergi atau kita akan berjuang hingga akhir,” kata Wong, walaupun kumpulan anti-Lynas yang lain gagal untuk mendapatkan kebenaran Mahkamah Rayuan untuk semakan keputusan kehakiman tentang TOL. Beliau juga berkata terdapat beberapa soalan yang tidak dapat diselesaikan: “Pelabuhan mana akan anda lalui? Bagaimana anda akan pek? Bagaimana anda akan mengangkut ia? Berapa lama mereka akan menyimpan sebelum kapal mereka kembali?"

Tan Bun Teet, pengerusi bersama Selamatkan Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL), berkata: “Adalah melucukan apabila kerajaan Malaysia mengeluarkan TOL untuk Lynas apabila kita tidak tahu bagaimana Lynas akan menguruskan sisa pepejal dan terdapat banyak isu-isu tertunggak.”

“SMSL ingin tahu setiap perincian kerana orang ramai mempunyai hak untuk tahu dan kami ingin meneliti setiap cadangan bahawa Lynas meletakkan keluar untuk memastikan mereka yang berdaya maju dan selamat.” Tan berkata bahawa “SMSL akan mengambil segala tindakan yang mungkin untuk mencuba melalui mahkamah dan ingat TOL dan untuk mengenakan tekanan politik melalui pengundi bagi menghentikan projek ini.”

Pengerusi Gabungan Hentikan Lynas (SLC), Andansura Rabu berkongsi pandangan Wong dengan mengatakan bahawa: “Kami masih mahu belajar apa yang sebenar mereka rancangkan... Kami mahu melihat rancangan terperinci apa yang mereka akan lakukan sebelum mereka dibenarkan untuk memproses dan mengendalikan.” Beliau berkata bahawa gabungan itu “ragu-ragu pelaksanaan rancangan Lynas", sama ada ia akan melibatkan mengubah sisa ke dalam perdagangan produk atau menghantar sisa kembali ke Australia.
Walaupun SLC bersetuju kepada kedua-dua idea, Andansura berkata mereka kekal tidak yakin jaminan Lynas.



Persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri Pahang hari ini diberitahu bahawa isu ancaman sianida terhadap penduduk sekitar Bukit Koman, Raub yang didakwa berpunca dari kilang Raub Australia Gold Mining (RAGM) merupakan satu agenda politik pembangkang.

Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Adnan Yaakob berkata ia bukan masalah alam sekitar sebaliknya isu politik yang sengaja digembar-gemburkan pembangkang. “Pembangkang sengaja menggunakan isu ini sebagai propaganda mereka. Ini dipelajari pembangkang dari ‘sifu’ mereka Adolf Hitler yang percaya bahawa setiap pembohongan jika diulang, orang akan percaya.

Isu RAGM ini seperti juga isu Lynas, dimainkan pembangkang. Perkara ini yang menjadi masalah mereka. Politik menjadi teruk apabila ada ‘hantu-hantu’ yang menjadi dalang merencanakan agenda di sebalik pakatan pembangkang,” katanya.

Beliau menjawab soalan Datuk Abdul Rahman Mohamad (BN-Padang Tengku) berhubung jumlah penduduk Bukit Koman yang mengalami masalah kegatalan kulit, mata dan sistem pernafasan berikutan operasi RAGM.

Sementara itu, Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kerajaan Tempatan, Alam Sekitar dan Kesihatan, Datuk Hoh Khai Mun berkata daripada kajian didapati hanya 24.6 peratus penduduk kampung terbabit mengalami masalah berkenaan.

“Secara umumnya, mereka yang mempunyai masalah penyakit kulit antara 12 hingga 23 peratus, masalah pening 20-60 peratus, masalah mata berair antara 4-12 peratus dan masalah bernafasan 7-13 peratus. Menjawab soalan Leong Ngah Ngah (DAP-Triang) mengenai ancaman sianida yang didakwa mengakibatkan penduduk Bukit Koman mengalami masalah kesihatan, Adnan berkata kerajaan negeri sudah menjalankan kajian dibantu pakar dari institusi pengajian tinggi (IPT) sejak 2009. “Daripada kajian tersebut didapati sianida bukan punca penyakit kulit yang dialami penduduk Bukit Koman,” katanya.

Detained in Kamunting for opposing rare earths plant #StopLynas


By Koh Jun Lin. Published by Malaysiakini on 17 April 2012.

Chemical engineering professor Tan Ka Kheng was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for fighting against the Bukit Merah rare earths plant in 1987, but that did not stop him from being involved in another similar campaign 25 years later.

Now an academician at a local private college as well as a researcher with the Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL), Tan has been actively speaking out against the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (Lamp) in Gebeng, Pahang.

He has made frequent appearances at public forums on Lynas and was among the experts who reviewed the Lynas documents - the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Radiological Impact Assessment (RIA) reports - when they were displayed for public viewing.

But more than three decades ago, the same efforts against the Asian Rare Earth (ARE) plant saw him become the first people to be nabbed under Operasi Lalang in 1987. "I asked the Special Branch (SB) during my interrogation, ‘why did you arrest me?'" recounted Tan in an interview with Malaysiakini.

The reply came, "Because you are a mastermind. You are in this Bakun (Dam) committee, PSG (Papan Support Group) chairperson, (founded the theatre group) Pentas... Your hands are everywhere."

Tan was then vice-chairperson of the Environmental Protection Society of Malaysia (EPSM), held a master's degree in environmental engineering from University of California in Berkeley, United States, and was a lecturer at Universiti Pertanian Malaysia (UPM, now known as Universiti Putra Malaysia).

"We came to know about this problem in Papan, Perak - the dumpsite," he explained, referring to the area earmarked for storage of the radioactive waste from the Asian Rare Earth (ARE) factory in Bukit Merah, Perak. "We realised their (villagers') problem... first of all, they were local grassroots people. Only a few of them could speak English; they did not know how to deal with the media.

"Then, of course, the government was very oppressive, it was during the (then prime minister Dr) Mahathir (Mohamad's) ‘white terror' period. "So we sourced materials, such as information about radiation and the plant. It so happened that both of these issues fall under my discipline," Tan said.

An eco-warrior in the making

In May 1984, the Papan Support Group (PSG) was formed to oppose the ARE with Tan as its chief. The PSG was a coalition of some 20 NGOs, among them Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (Abim), Federation of Malaysian Consumers Associations (Fomca) and the Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC).

"At the time I was elected chairperson of PSG, I knew that they (the police) would come. I would have to go in (to prison). In our activities, we have no reservations. We fight for justice, we fight for environmental protection," Tan recalled.

The following years saw many protests being held against the Papan dumpsite and the ARE plant, and several of them had thousands of protesters taking part, including one 1,500-strong hunger strike against the dumpsite in December 1984, and a protest of 10,000 people against the ARE in April 1987. Some of these resulted in clashes with the police.

In addition, PSG brought in foreign experts to review the dumpsite, such as American epidemiologist Rosalie Bertell and Japanese geneticist Sadao Ichikawa, both of whom deemed the area hazardous.

"Simultaneously (around 1985), Mahathir was dreaming his grandiose idea of building this dam in Bakun, Sarawak. I also chaired a committee of various NGOs... to support the tribal people of Sarawak in opposing the project," Tan said.

In the months leading up to Operasi Lalang, Tan began to notice that his telephone connection began deteriorating, raising suspicions that his phone was being tapped. "One day, a man with Telekom Malaysia uniform came and said he wanted to repair my phone. I looked at him and said, ‘you don't look like you are a technician'. "He ran away!" Tan laughed. He later recognised the ‘technician' as one of his Special Branch interrogators. "I can't remember how it (the ISA arrests) came about, but generally we can see it coming. So we even held this ‘last supper'. He said during the supper about two months prior to the arrests under Operasi Lalang, those attending - at least 12 of them - made their parting requests, such as asking their friends to bring reading materials to prison. However, Ka Kheng does not remember what he said. "It was too long ago. I only remember this grand last supper. Good wine, good food, a lot of singing...," he said.

First to be arrested during Operasi Lalang

About 1am on Oct 27, 1987, as Tan was sleeping at his house before taking a flight to Singapore to discuss a business plan with his former employer, police came knocking on his door. The next day, newspapers announced his arrest and that of 18 others - it was the beginning of Operasi Lalang.

Tan was first taken the Petaling Jaya district police headquarters for a few hours, then to an unknown detention centre where he was kept in solitary confinement for 60 days. To this day, he can only guess at the location of the detention centre. "They had four-hour shifts for the interrogators. Every four hours they would change interrogators. They're fresh and you're bloody tired. They'd come up with so-called new evidence, new allegations or new questions," Tan said of his interrogation.

It was during his interrogation that he found out that he was the first to be arrested during Operasi Lalang, out of a total of 106 individuals detained. Tan was also accused of being the second-in-command of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), and of attempting to revive its auxiliary wing, the ‘United Front', in an effort to overthrow the government.

"I said, ‘I am not so strong, sorry. I am not that powerful. I am only a weakling, just a scholar. It's just that I am very clear-minded. Right is right; wrong is wrong,'" the environmental activist recalled his response to his interrogators. "They accused me of starting Pentas, like an old-style communist cultural group, which was also not true.

"They said Pentas worked with this Filipino theatre group that was a subversive group, and that Filipino President Corazon Aquino wrote a letter to Mahathir to support my case," Tan explained. He was eventually slapped with a two-year detention order and sent to the infamous Kamunting Detention Camp near Taiping in Perak. During his interrogation, he said, the interrogators sometimes slammed their palms on the table and on one occasion threatened to crush his testicles if he did not cooperate.

'We're just moving the fence'

However, Tan was eventually released on the evening of Aug 25, 1988, serving only eight months of his detention order. "When I left, the Special Branch officer told me, ‘Tan, when you go out, don't think that you are free. We're just moving the fence,'" he said. He said he continued to be followed by people he believes were with the police, but the surveillance stopped after a while.

That is, until Himpunan Hijau 2.0 on Feb 26 this year, when he found a foreign object in his mobile phone's USB port. While his 303 days of incarceration under Operasi Lalang has not dampened his spirit as an eco-warrior, the prospect of history repeating looms over him like a dark cloud.

Tan believes that an Operasi Lalang 2.0 is possible. "Najib (Prime Minister and Umno president Najib Abdul Razak) is not in a commanding position (within Umno). He has to do something drastic. "If he follows the example of Mahathir, that is to go for massive arrests again, it could stop some Umno leaders from opposing him.

"It's not far-fetched. The situation of Umno politics now has gone back to 1987. The only difference now is that we have four states under Pakatan Rakyat." However, Tan is unmoved by the possibility of a second detention.

"If they detain me, other people will continue (the fight). We will win because truth is on our side," he said.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Open Letter to the PM on forest conservation


FMT LETTER: From Lim Teck Wyn, via e-mail. Published by Free Malaysia Today on 14 September 2012.

Dear Sir,


Politics, race and religion tend to be divisive but all Malaysians can unite around our beautiful natural heritage, our green environment and lush rainforests. It is thus worth examining this year’s Merdeka theme “Janji Ditepati” (Promises Fulfilled) from the perspective of nature conservation.

To start with, we rightly celebrate that the British kept their promise to grant us our independence and we have steered the course of our own development over the last 55 years.  However, human development has not been without cost to the natural world and our growing cities, agriculture and infrastructure all have taken a toll.

Recognising the need to strike a balance, former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir, pledged to keep 50% of Malaysia’s land area under forest cover. This promise was made to the leaders of the world assembled at the first Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.

Today, the official statistics suggest that we still have 56% of our forest intact.  However, independent satellite analysis reveals that this figure includes plantations and the true area of natural forest is 14,962,000 hectares, which is only 45% of our land area.

In Rio we also signed the Convention on Biological Diversity, pledging to conserve our plants, animals and their habitats. Today, however, the rhino, the banteng and the leatherback turtle are no longer found in Peninsular Malaysia.

The call of the Burung Merak (the green peacock) is no longer heard on our shores. The last remaining stands of the Pokok Damar Hitam (Shorea kuantanensis) have been cleared for a Felda plantation and this tree species has now been declared to be extinct.

Scores of other Malaysian endemics are classified as critically endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and are thus on the verge of extinction. Even the wild population of our national mascot, the Malayan Tiger, has dwindled to less than 500 and they continue to face serious threats from rampant poaching and the continued destruction and fragmentation of their forest home.

Unfortunately, even the remaining forest constituted in “permanent” reserves is not safe from the chainsaw, the bulldozer and the expansion of the concrete jungle.  Wildlife reserves, forest reserves and state parks are routinely cleared to make way for the relentless expansion of civilisation.

On Aug 27, 2005, you officiated the launch of the Selangor State Park whereby the government promised to “conserve and nurture” the forest for future generations.  However, there is now a plan to build a highway right through this heritage park.

The Highways Authority proposes to destroy hundreds of hectares of forest in the Selangor State Park in order to build the East Klang Valley Expressway (EKVE).  The plan is for this route to be the final section of the Kuala Lumpur Outer Ring Road (KLORR), linking Cheras with Bukit Antarabangsa and hopefully alleviating jams on the MRR2.

However, the proposed alignment of the highway would cut through the Ampang Forest Reserve -ma water catchment area that was gazetted as far back as 1912 in order to protect the Ampang water intake point which is a source of fresh water for the Klang Valley.

The protection of the Selangor State Park is also important for flood mitigation.  It has been reported that the flash flood on March 8, 2012 forced hundreds of Ampang residents to evacuate their homes and caused damage exceeding RM10 million.

The proposed EKVE may lead to or exacerbate future floods which are becoming a significant problem in the Klang Valley which has already experienced eight serious floods this year. In keeping with the theme of Janji Ditepati, now is the time for the federal and state governments to make good on the pledge to conserve our forests.

Let’s act now and ensure that we keep all forest reserves covered by natural forest, put a halt to the excision of reserves and create new totally protected areas.  In particular, let us protect Ampang Forest Reserve and make sure that any highway would not damage the forest.

In our pursuit of development, let us honour the promises we have made to future generations in Malaysia and in the world. In this way we can celebrate our independence with pride.

The writer is Hon Secretary of the Malaysian Nature Society.

Monday, April 5, 2010

Hak kehidupan dan kerakyatan Bumiputera Negeri Sarawak


Projek pembinaan Empangan Bakun yang dijalankan telah melebihi 10 tahun dan projek ini masih berterusan. Pada bulan Januari 2010, untuk menggerakan pembangunan ekonomi Negara dengan alasan, Negara kita telah menandatangani satu perjanjian mengenai penyusunan sumber tenaga secara menyeluruh dengan Negara China. Mengikut perjanjian tersebut, pembinaan beberapa empangan air dan projek perlombongan arang batu akan dilaksanakan di negeri Sarawak. Perlaksanaan perjanjian tersebut bukan sahaja akan menyebabkan golongan bumiputra di negeri Sarawak kehilangan tempat tinggal bahkan menyebabkan sistem ekologi, hutan dan tanah subur bumiputra dilanda bencana.


Wakil dari golongan bumiputra dari Bakun yang giat membela nasib mereka dan membantah pengusiran akan menghadiri forum ini. Mereka akan menerangkan kesulitan dan kehidupan mereka yang sering menghadapi pengusiran daripada kerajaan.


Mengikut pengumuman Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya Malaysia, Negeri Sarawak mempunyai 924,000 orang yang layak mengundi pada masa kini, tetapi masih terdapat 470,000 orang tidak berdaftar sebagai pengundi. Hal ini menyebabkan Pilihan Raya Negeri Sarawak hanya melaksanakan setengah demokrasi sahaja. Lebih daripada setengah bumiputra yang tidak mempunyai kad pengenalan atau surat kelahiran dan surat kerakyatan menyebabkan mereka kehilangan hak mengundi. Selain itu, kawasan pendalaman Negeri Sarawak kekurangan kemudahan asas seperti bekalan air dan elektrik, sekolah dan perkhidmatan perubatan dalam jangka masa yang panjang, menyebabkan golongan bumiputra berasa mereka disisirkan.


Forum ini akan menyiarkan tayangan video untuk memberi gambaran yang lengkap kepada para hadirin tentang kehidupan pendalaman Negeri Sarawak dan mengikut perkembangan golongan bumiputra yang telah disisirkan dan perjuangan mereka. Selain itu, forum ini juga akan menjemput sukarelawan yang membantu menjalankan pendaftaran pengundi untuk berkongsi pengalaman mereka.


Tajuk ForumHak kehidupan dan kerakyatan Bumiputera Negeri Sarawak

Tarikh7hb April 2010 (Rabu), pukul 8 malam

Penganjur Bersama

Kenyalang Power Initiative, Komiti Sosial Ekonomi-Dewan Perhimpunan Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor, Hua Zong: A 20 Year Plan of Action For Malaysia

TempatAuditorium KLSCAH

Panel Forum

Wing MikuAhli Anti-Gerakan Bakun, Blogger, Ooi Thean Poh (Jurutera elektronik), Chen Shaua FuiWartawanMerdekareview.com

Pengaturcara: Chow Z NamPernebit TV


Pihak penganjur menjemput orang ramai yang mengambil perhatian tentang hak golongan bumiputra Negeri Sarawak untuk menghadiri forum tersebut. Pada malam tersebut, kami akan mendaftar sukarelawan “Lawatan Demokrasi Negeri Sarawak” untuk sama-sama menggiatkan kempen mendaftar pengundi, mendidik pengundi dan latihan mengawasi kempen Pilihan Raya.


Sebarang pertanyaan, sila hubungi Encik Chia di talian 03-2274 6645 dan Fax 03-2272 4089.


Tan Soon Lim

Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Sosial Ekonomi,

Dewan Perhimpunan China Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor


Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Behind The Baram Blockades




Over the past week, there have been numerous reports about the blockades by several Penan communities in Tutoh-Apoh, Patah, and Baram, Sarawak. The blockades were to halt the transportation of logs by several logging business groups.

These groups have been harvesting timber within the traditional territories of the surrounding villages in the above-mentioned places.

According to community representatives, the blockades were set up for several interrelated reasons. Firstly, with the advent of large monoculture plantations, the people's forest resources are in a state of acute decline.

If logging had devastating impact on affected communities, plantations would be worst off. Clear-felling operations entail the total destruction of the people's land and forest resources, including their communal water catchments.

Secondly, this impending deforestation disaster is certainly linked to the lack of land rights of the native communities to their traditional territories. For years, the communities' numerous applications for their village forest reserves to be gazetted into Communal Forest Reserves have never been approved by the state.

The people maintain that logging has failed to produce meaningful benefits to local communities and has instead, over the years severely compromised their quality of life. They point out that local people even miss out on employment opportunities, as companies seem to prefer to hire Indonesian labour.

The people also stress that their efforts to negotiate with the companies and their agents have often been futile. The protestors are determined not to give in into any intimidations or threats to dismantle the barricades unless their demands are met.

Foremost, they call for all logging and plantation operations to be halted on their land, a call, that if left unheeded, may lead to significant food deprivation and widespread malnutrition among the people.

Equally important, the people also want their Native Customary Rights (NCR) to be fully recognised, and that they be allowed to exercise self-determination with regards to any development plans that may affect them.

In our view, all the demands above certainly require an urgent comprehensive response at a policy level from the Sarawak state government.

We find the statement attributed to Sarawak's Rural Development Minister James Masing in an AFP news article published on Aug 23, which describes the Penan communities as "good storytellers" and that their land rights disputes "were often aimed at wringing more compensation from companies" as most regretful.

Similarly, we find the insinuations about the communities' blockades by state assemblyperson Lihan Jok equally unacceptable. Lihan was quoted by Utusan Borneo on Aug 30, suggesting that the blockades appear to show the Penan communities are uncivilised, this despite the fact that many are highly educated.

In fact, the latest blockades leads to questions about the sustainability claims of the Sarawak timber and plantation industries. Many Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) reports of the projects in the area seem to suggest that plantation development is necessary in Sarawak due to the depletion in timber resources in the state.

However, timber harvesting for Dipterocarp forests within the Sarawak PFE supposedly operates under a 25-year cutting cycle. If it is indeed true that timber has been largely depleted in just 30 years since large-scale logging commenced in the state, Sarawak should no longer claim to be practising sustainable forestry management.

We believe that the Sarawak state government has also failed to take full cognisance of our judicial decisions on native rights. The Federal Court in 2007 has ruled that native rights owes its existence to native customary laws and not to any modern statute or legislation, while affirming that individual and communal native rights have equal legal force. Our Appeals Court has affirmed that such rights cover both cultivated and forested areas.

SAM is of the view that the continuous occurrence of land rights protests in Sarawak is a result of the absence of a participatory and consultative demarcation process of native territorial boundaries in Sarawak.

Such a process should incorporate the Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) mechanism and a set of substantiation procedures designed to yield corroborative evidence to support each native land rights claim.

Given all the facts above, we call on the Sarawak state government to fulfil all the demands made by the blockading communities and exercise restraint in dealing with the protest.

In our view, unless Sarawak halts further forest conversions in the state and subsequently establishes a consultative demarcation process which takes cognisance of the full stature, nature and extent of the NCR as ruled by our judiciary, any sustainability claims made on both the timber and plantation industries in Sarawak must be treated with great caution.

S M Mohamed Idris is the president of Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM)

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Few doubt the science of climate change – but its impact on the world's poor is largely ignored


This silent suffering
By Rajendra Pachauri
Guardian (UK) 29 May 2009

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Crisis In The Land Of The Indigenous People






The first time I heard of Baram was when I received an email from my friend, Lana, the director of CREST. There have been floods in the district of Baram, near Miri, Sarawak. She was sourcing for volunteers for the crisis relief team and for finance to help the villagers affected by the floods. “This really is not the right time,” I thought as I glanced at the files in my office. Writing a cheque to CREST should be enough on my part. I could not get a good night’s sleep since then. So I volunteered to join the relief team.

On 16 March, we took a flight from LCCT (KL) to Miri airport. There were 4 members in this team. All except me were men. Being a rose among thorns has its advantages: my “brothers” carried all the heavy loads including my baggage (kononnya nak tunjuk macho), nobody complained (at least I did not hear of any) when I hoarded the bathroom, I was given the front passenger seat and I have a room all to myself throughout this trip.

From Miri to Kuala Baram, we travelled by taxi. The road is straight and newly tarred, thanks to SHELL. Then we took the express long boat to go up the river. For the next 4 days, we travelled from one village to another: Marudi, Long Ikang, Long Lama and Long Bemang; on the river by a small motor boat and on land by a Toyota Hilux 4WD. Purchased and distributed the relief supplies to the villagers. When we travelled on the river, I remained on the lookout for crocodiles. To my disappointment, I spotted only a five feet basking under the sun throughout this entire trip. The ones I saw in the JB zoo were larger than that. No, I am sure that I did not miss anything. Believe me, we had to take a small boat that was only slightly wider than my hips and had to cling on to both sides for our dear lives. I paid my utmost attention to the waters around us.

The villagers (mostly Kayans, Ibans and Penans) did not ask for much, only for what is necessary to survive the crisis and to move on with their lives.

Tok Kampung of Long Ikang was once a brave warrior. However, he could not protect his village from the floods. He looked so defeated and resigned to fate. He was grateful to the churches that contributed when we arrived with the relief supplies for his people. We were told that the river has changed. It used to be clear, deep and teeming with marine life. The massive logging, quarry and clearing of the land for palm oil plantations have eroded the lands. This caused the soil to be flushed by the rain into the river. Years of accumulation of the soil has raised the level of the river.

Tok Penghulu of Long Bemang informed us that the floods were more frequent in the recent years. There were 10 times last year. Our government has sent representatives to estimate the extent of the crisis. Each family has been given RM50. That was a month ago.

Contrary to what I have learnt in my Form 3 Geography, the long-houses are no longer made of wood or bamboo. They are about 100 units of modern concrete buildings joined together to form a long-house. If an estimated value of each unit is RM20,000, then a long house will cost RM2,000,000. Therefore, it is unrealistic and impractical to expect the people to shift to higher grounds. Most of the villagers are farmers and fishermen, hence, could not afford to build another long-house. The massive logging and quarry activities together with deforestation are choking the river and robbing the livelihood of these indigenous people. The increasingly frequent floods not only damaged the long-houses but also destroyed the padi and the fields.

The whole eco-system in this district has been brutally jeopardised. Even the wild animals are dwindling in numbers. That was why I could not spot anymore crocodiles. The greed of human beings in the name of “development” has no bounds. When will enough be enough?

When we left for KL on 20 March, I was caught in a dilemma. On one hand, I could sleep peacefully knowing that I have done my part. On the other, there remained so much to do...

Today is Earth Day, the annual celebration on the 22nd of April all over the world. It is intended to inspire awareness for the Earth’s environment on a daily basis; to promote a sustainable environment and to protest against environmental pollutions. How do you and I play our parts? Here are some suggestions:

  1.  Cultivate the habit of recycling,
  2. Cut down on petrol, electricity and water consumption,
  3.  Call on our government to recognise and protect more lands as reserved lands for the indigenous people,
  4.  Protest against the industries that cause pollutions,
  5. Boycott the product(s) or investment(s) of those industries,
  6. Apply more pressure on our government and legislators to promote and enforce eco-friendly legislation, and
  7. Set an example for the next generation.