Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Religion. Show all posts

Friday, December 2, 2016

Meanwhile in Malaysia...

Ten institutions at the forefront of Malaysia's efforts to help Malays and Muslims are in danger of folding or losing their power if the opposition, led by the Chinese-dominated Democratic Action Party (DAP), takes over the country, Prime Minister Najib Razak said yesterday.
Not so fast, said a constitutional lawyer and the opposition.
Datuk Seri Najib was trying to paint a dark picture for his core Malay-Muslim voters so that they remain loyal to him, analysts say.
Many of these government agencies are much loved by the bumiputeras - Malays and other indigenous races - and Muslims. This is because the public-funded institutions have for decades provided them with state-endorsed privileges such as scholarships, education and job quotas, and subsidies for businesses and Islamic pilgrimages.
But experts say most of these agencies are formed from statutes passed in Parliament, and it would be much harder to eliminate them than Mr Najib's speech implies.
"You'll need an Act to abolish these institutions and DAP doesn't have the numbers to do that," said constitutional lawyer Syahredzan Johan.
Amending laws in the federal Parliament requires a majority vote, but DAP won only 38 seats out of 222 in the 2013 General Election.
"It's fear-mongering at its worst, and at best, it's political rhetoric. As the elections draw closer, we'll see more of this rhetoric," he added.
In the past, opposition parties have questioned how some of these agencies were run, citing corruption or financial mismanagement allegations. But none has publicly called for the agencies to be dismantled.
Chief secretary Saifuddin Abdullah of opposition coalition Pakatan Harapan said that as part of the coalition's agreement, DAP had signed on "to uphold the Constitution, including the provisions on Islam, Malay special rights, Malay language and Malay rulers".
"Najib is using racial rhetoric and lies to demonise DAP to divert attention from his multitude of scandals involving 1MDB and SRC International," said DAP MP Tony Pua, referring to the scandal-hit state funds.
These are the agencies named by Prime Minister Najib Razak and their main functions:
•UiTM: university and college education body
•Mara: education and business trust
•Jakim: Islamic development department
•Tabung Haji: Islamic pilgrimage fund
•Felda: land development agency for farmers
•Felcra: rural land development agency
•Risda: Rubber smallholders development authority
•Jawhar: Islamic property, tithes and haj department
•Teraju: small businesses development agency
•State zakat boards: collection of annual Muslim tithes
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on December 02, 2016, with the headline 'Islamic bodies at risk? Not true, say some'. 

Sunday, August 10, 2014

Why Christ, Mao And The Buddha Are Making A Comeback In China


By Matt Sheehan. Posted on 08/06/2014 8:31 am EDT Updated: 08/07/2014 2:59 pm EDT by The Huffington Post.

BEIJING -- The dominant political narrative in China today is one of resounding triumph: targets for economic growth achieved, rival countries overtaken, an Olympics successfully hosted. Yet in the telling of a philosophy professor at a prominent Shanghai university, many of these supposed victories have proven hollow for the Chinese people.

"On the surface we've achieved the goals, but no one is happy," the professor, who goes by the English name Luke, told The WorldPost. "There's no love, no hope. For more than 100 years we Chinese have been trying to catch up with Western countries. We want science, technology and military power. But the most important thing is the soul of the culture. The mind is based on the soul, and we've lost our souls."

Luke, who asked that his Chinese name not be used because he worships in one of China's many illegal underground churches, isn't alone in his concern for the state of the country's soul. As a convert to Christianity, he is one of a growing number of Chinese who are turning to a variety of faiths as they grapple with what they say is a gaping moral abyss in society.

"People today are afraid of showing love, afraid of being laughed at by other people," Luke lamented. "That spells the end of society."

China’s Christian population has been expanding at rates that rival its awe-inspiring GDP growth, with one scholar predicting that by 2030 China will be home to more Christians than any other country on earth. Many Chinese are also seeking solace in traditional belief systems such as Buddhism and Confucianism, in what they describe as a reaction to China's transformation from a poor agricultural society to an urban-industrial powerhouse. Yet others have found spiritual comfort in a return to Communist ideology and view Mao Zedong, former chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, as a savior who will help them revive communal bonds.

"Many people perceive a moral and spiritual crisis in China today," wrote the editors of the Review of Religion and Chinese Society, a new academic journal dissecting China's religious revival. "The foundation of a better future for China is believed by many people to be a spiritual renewal."

The topics of faith and the state of one's soul have been on the backburner for many Chinese since 1978, when leader Deng Xiaoping turned China away from the pursuit of a Communist utopia and toward the construction of a modern market economy.

Deng's sober and pragmatic push for economic reform came in response to Mao's Cultural Revolution, a movement from 1966 to 1976 to enforce Mao's version of Communism and purge China of any competing ideologies, everything from capitalism to Confucianism. Fanatical believers in the movement desecrated the Buddhist and Confucian temples that had served as the bedrock of Chinese spirituality for thousands of years. Meanwhile, Mao issued ideological manifestos and presided over mass public rallies that elevated him to God-like status in the hearts of many.

The Cultural Revolution robbed China of a decade of development, demonized traditional Chinese religious practices -- and, in the process, discredited Maoism for millions. Since then, 35 years of economic reform have more than quintupled both rural and urban income levels. But China and its people are currently at the "lowest of lows," according to Luke.

Asked to identify the low point for Chinese society, Luke and many other Chinese point to Oct. 13, 2011. That was the day Wang Yue, the 2-year-old daughter of migrant shopkeepers in southern China, wandered into an alley behind her father's store and was run over by two vehicles. For seven minutes she lay crying and bleeding in the street as 18 pedestrians, one by one, delicately made their way around her body without doing anything to help. It wasn't until a woman scavenging for trash came upon her mangled body that Wang was taken to a hospital, where she died eight days later.

The entire event was captured on closed-circuit television, and this bone-chilling display of indifference to human suffering was the second most viewed video of the year in China. What became known as the "little Yue Yue incident" stirred up a wave of soul-searching and hand-wringing among Chinese people, and strengthened Luke's conviction that China needs God's grace.

DABBLING IN FAITH

Luke's personal journey to Christianity had already begun a few years earlier after he made a painful decision facing hundreds of millions of Chinese: He left behind his wife and young child, moving to another province in pursuit of a better job. The coveted position as a professor of philosophy at a prestigious university came at the cost of personal isolation and a deteriorating marriage.

Luke first sought solace in the practice of Buddhism, but said he quickly grew disillusioned with the monks' emphasis on hierarchy and ceremonial gifts.

"I took on a Buddhist name, read the books, and for two months prayed every day, but I didn't find peace," Luke recalled.

He then turned toward the western tradition of Christianity, which he'd first encountered several years earlier in philosophy courses. After a brief period of time attending the state-sanctioned "Three-Self" churches, Luke found a loving community and a sense of belonging in an underground "house church."

"The relationship between the brothers and sisters is full of love, and everyone can speak," Luke said. "It's not like the Three-Self churches where only the priest can speak and everyone else sits there listening."

He said the sense of purpose and humility that came with his conversion have transformed his life and marriage, as well as the way he sees his country and culture. Luke believes that Christianity can also help China solve its myriad social woes and put an end to the spiritual drift that followed the Cultural Revolution.

"The culture was and still is destroyed," Luke said. "The most important things for Chinese people have been demolished, and what happened to little Yue Yue is related to the destruction of that meaning."

REVERTING TO RED

Each Sunday morning, while Luke is worshipping the Christian God in a house church, 54-year-old Fan Huiming is attending her own services in Jingshan Park at the very center of Beijing. She plays the role of congregant, preacher and choir member, putting all her heart into singing the praise of a different deity: Chairman Mao Zedong.

"It doesn't matter whether you look at his leadership, his art, his poems, his philosophy, his calligraphy ... In my heart he's simply a perfect person," Fan said. "As someone who truly loves Chairman Mao, as a true Marxist-Leninist, I will never change my faith."

Fan's faith is a result of her birth into unique historical circumstances. Just as Mao's Red Army was closing in on Beijing and preparing to declare the founding of the People's Republic of China in the fall of 1949, Fan was born in the capital to parents who were officials in Chiang Kai-Shek's defeated Nationalist government. Many in her family were able to flee to Taiwan, but Fan's pregnant mother couldn't make the journey, and she gave birth to Fan amid the tumult of the new Communist order.

Her status as the child of Nationalists -- Mao's sworn enemies -- would dog Fan through much of her life. Despite a fanatical devotion to Mao and a venomous hatred for the Nationalists, she said she has never been allowed to join the Chinese Communist Party. But what she lacked in credentials she made up for in zeal. Throughout the Cultural Revolution she collected Mao memorabilia, memorized his speeches and struggled against capitalists and all perceived enemies of the proletariat class.

Thirty-eight years after Mao's death, she still gathers with fellow Mao devotees in Jingshan Park every Sunday morning to sing red songs, hold up Mao's portrait and lecture passersby through a microphone. A sturdy and serious woman, Fan shuns the "red" dancing that many of her fellow 60-somethings enjoy, choosing instead to challenge people who seek to tarnish Mao's image.

"Nowadays you have so many people attacking Chairman Mao," Fan fumed. "I'll just come right out and say it: Those people are taking money from the American government."

Her impassioned defense of Mao's legacy stems from rosy childhood memories of the chairman's reign, when everyday life was imbued with a kind of communal spirituality, she said.

"Mao Zedong's era was about saving people's souls, about teaching people to strive for something higher," Fan said. "People from that time really put all their heart and soul into building this country and into following Mao Zedong."

Fan said she remembers a time when no one locked their doors at night, and maintains that the crimes committed in a single day in 2013 surpassed those committed over the entirety of Mao's 27-year reign. In her mind, the Cultural Revolution was a necessary bump on the road to a Communist utopia; where things really turned sour was with economic reform, she said.

"When Deng Xiaoping first brought up this idea of letting some people get rich first, it was just wrong, and it completely violated the main principle of the Communist movement," Fan said emphatically. "Everything is going in the direction of privatization. We're missing the concept of doing things for the common good, for the country, and to serve the people."

In the early 1980s she wrote a letter to Deng expressing this sentiment. She was rewarded not with a reply from China's leader, but with an ominous visit from state security agents.

Yet decades into the changes that have catapulted China toward superpower status, she is still a true believer in the principles of her youth.

"We've been through so much, and now only Mao Zedong Thought can save China," Fan said. "After so many years of reform and opening, people are just more isolated and hopeless."

Adoration for Mao is concentrated heaviest among people who came of age during the Cultural Revolution, but it has also spilled over into broader society during moments of international tension. During anti-Japan protests in recent years, patriotic demonstrators frequently carried portraits of the former leader and chanted, "Long live Chairman Mao!"

For Fan and her cohorts, an absolute faith in Mao has morphed the man into something of an omniscient and all-powerful God whose spirit still permeates the world. Following devastating tornadoes in the American Midwest during the summer of 2013, she wrote in a text message: "The spirit of Chairman Mao Zedong is always protecting the people he loves, the people of the world ... If the American government perpetrates evil, then the heavens will react! Bigger tornadoes, bigger volcanic eruptions!"

Her vision may be one of fire and brimstone, but ever since retiring from her job in the long-distance bus industry, Fan said she has been content engaging in more mundane acts of revolution by bringing her message to the people of Jingshan Park every Sunday. The one disappointment for Fan has been her son's indifference to Mao's message.

"To tell the truth, when I talk to my son about this, he just doesn't want to get involved in politics," Fan said while running her thumb over a Cultural Revolution-era Mao button. "He always tells me, 'That's all behind us, don't always bring it up.' But in my heart that really makes me sad.

"In China, society's influence is stronger than the family's. No matter what kind of education my son gets at home, as soon as he goes out the door he'll run into that kind of pollution from society."

BUDDHISM AS 'SOCIAL EDUCATION'

In the central Chinese city of Xi'an, home to the ancient terracotta warriors, Samantha Yang has had better luck in sharing her newfound spirituality with her son, Leo. Yang runs her own English training school in Xi'an, and the financial pressures from the school, combined with her struggles as a single mom, brought her to Buddhism.

Yang grew up with no strong spiritual influences in her life, and left her hometown of Xi'an after college to seek employment in the southern island province of Hainan. After working as a saleswoman for a cosmetics company, she founded her own English-language training school in 2002 for children back in her hometown.

"For a long time I thought I was a superwoman," Yang recalled. "I thought I could do anything.

"When I first started the school, there was just so much pressure in my life. In 2006 we ran a summer program and lost 200,000 yuan [about $25,000], which was really hard to deal with. I tried reading some philosophy and even looked at those Chicken Soup books, but none of it was for me."

Yang's spiritual breakthrough came when a friend brought her to a Buddhist monastery in a village outside of Xi'an. During some of her first meals at the monastery she was captivated by the practitioners' refusal to waste an ounce of food. When she left her mostly-eaten watermelon slices on a plate, the elderly woman collecting dishes chewed the last remaining hint of pink off Yang's white watermelon rinds.

That humility and simplicity won Yang over. She said she now practices Buddhism not only because it brings her peace, but because she views it as a "social education system" for Chinese society. The religion advocates a serenity and humility that stand in stark contrast to many people's frenzied desire to accumulate wealth at any cost. Its appeal has fueled what many say is a Buddhist revival in China, with surveys suggesting that up to one-third of Chinese now consider themselves Buddhists.

In Yang's assessment, traditional Chinese culture has been eroding since 1919, when nationalist student demonstrations known as the May Fourth Movement blamed China's Confucian tradition for the country's domination by colonial powers. She sees those attacks on China's ancient heritage as having destroyed something fundamental to the culture.

Yang and her son have approached Buddhism in different ways. While Leo rarely visits the monastery, Yang has noticed a new equanimity in her son despite the pressure-cooker environment in Chinese high schools. Yang has taken up chanting meditation at the monastery as a way to clear her mind of the "wild luxury ideas" that she feels permeate contemporary Chinese society.

Searching for the root of her own spiritual journey, Yang looks back to her grandmother, a peasant who never abandoned China's diverse array of folk religions.

"My grandmother was very open to belief," Yang said. "She was willing to worship almost anything, any God she thought had power. I think maybe she was a seed for my faith."

The simplicity and community Yang has found at her monastery give her hope that China can be saved from what she describes as its current state of ethical anarchy. Her faith has taken a different form from that of Luke and Fan, but in searching for a moral compass to navigate the tumult of modern China, they have all forged their own path toward personal salvation and social redemption.

"The fate of Western society is comedy, but in China it's tragedy: hopeless, aimless, meaningless," Luke said. "The fate of China can be changed to comedy."

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

Kisah 2 Seminar: Yang Mana Kebenaran Dan Yang Mana Ajaran Sesat?

Diterbitkan pada 1 Julai 2014 oleh The Malaysian Insider.

Jawatankuasa Fatwa Negeri Terengganu sebulat suara memutuskan bahawa kenyataan bekas aktivis politik dan sosial Kassim Ahmad pada satu seminar Februari lalu sebagai pemikiran yang kufur dan murtad.

Pesuruhjaya Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Terengganu, Datuk Mohd Rozali Salleh berkata keputusan itu dicapai dalam satu mesyuarat khas kali pertama jawatankuasa itu yang bersidang pada 9 Mac lalu.

"Seminar Pemikiran Kassim Ahmad: Suatu Penilaian" itu berlangsung di Putrajaya.

Mohd Rozali berkata, "Fahaman atau golongan tersebut adalah sesat, menyeleweng dan menjadi ancaman kepada ketenteraman awam serta merosakkan akidah mereka.

"Berdasarkan kepada ucapan yang telah disampaikan oleh Kassim Ahmad, terdapat unsur penyelewengan antaranya mempertikaikan syahadah yang kedua, mengingkari dan mempertikaikan hadis sebagai sumber hukum, mempertikaikan hukum rambut perempuan sebagai aurat, hukum selawat dan membenarkan jenayah murtad berlaku dalam masyarakat," katanya dalam sidang media hari ini.

Sehubungan itu, jawatankuasa fatwa turut memutuskan apa jua fahaman yang berunsurkan penolakan hadis ini perlu disekat dari berkembang.

Mohd Rozali berkata sebarang penerbitan, penyiaran dan penyebaran apa-apa buku, risalah, filem, video dan apa sahaja berhubung fahaman ini adalah diharamkan dan orang Islam dilarang memiliki, menyimpan mencetak, menjual atau mengedarkan semua bahan terbabit.

"Mana-mana orang Islam sama ada secara individu atau berkumpulan yang mengikuti fahaman anti hadis ini dengan berselindung di sebalik aktiviti ekonomi, perniagaan, pendidikan, kesenian dan sebagainya yang mempunyai unsur persefahaman anti hadis ini adalah dianggap mengamalkan fahaman yang bercanggah dengan syariat.

"Oleh demikian, orang ramai di negeri ini hendaklah menghindarkan diri daripada terlibat dengan fahaman golongan tersebut," katanya.

Mesyuarat jawatankuasa itu juga bersetuju supaya keputusan berhubung fahaman anti hadis ini diwartakan untuk dijadikan fatwa yang mengikat bagi membolehkan tindakan diambil terhadap kesalahan yang terbabit, katanya. – Bernama, 1 Julai, 2014.

Link: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/bahasa/article/jawatankuasa-fatwa-terengganu-putuskan-kassim-ahmad-kufur-dan-murtad


Oleh Uthaya Sankar SB. Diterbitkan oleh The Malay Mail Online pada 19 Mei 2014.

Maklumat mengenai “Seminar Kalimah Allah dan Kristologi Nusantara” anjuran Majlis Agama Islam Selangor (Mais) dan Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) sebenarnya sudah saya ketahui sejak bulan lalu.

Akhbar Utusan Malaysia (21 April 2014) melaporkan pengerusi Mais, Datuk Mohamad Adzib Mohd Isa sebagai berkata, “ia bertujuan meningkatkan kefahaman masyarakat Islam dan mencari penyelesaian berhubung isu tersebut (kalimah Allah).”

Kononnya, seminar itu “akan memberi penjelasan kepada umat Islam tentang isu penggunaan kalimah Allah serta mencari penyelesaian secara efektif dan menyeluruh untuk menangani masalah yang timbul.”

Pada waktu itu, dilaporkan bahawa apa yang bakal berlangsung adalah “satu seminar yang besar dengan melibatkan lebih 5,000 peserta daripada pelbagai lapisan masyarakat seperti penuntut institusi pengajian tinggi, pertubuhan bukan kerajaan dan ulama dari seluruh negara.”

Bagaimanapun, apa yang sebenarnya berlaku pada 6 Mei 2014 ternyata adalah sebaliknya. Bukan sahaja jumlah peserta hanya sekitar 1,000 orang (berbanding jangkaan 5,000 orang), malah seminar ini dijadikan medan untuk mempersenda ajaran Kristian dan penganut Kristian secara keseluruhan.

Sebagai seorang pengamal media, penulis dan pengamal multifaith (percaya pada ajaran semua agama), saya amat terkejut dan kecewa apabila UiTM bersekongkol dengan Mais dalam menganjurkan sebuah seminar yang secara terang-terangan berciri anti-Kristian, anti-perpaduan, berniat jahat serta tidak mengambil kira sensitiviti masyarakat.

Kandungan seminar berkenaan juga secara jelas membawa unsur-unsur serta anasir-anasir yang mampu mengancam ketenteraman awam dalam kalangan masyarakat pelbagai kaum, agama, etnik, kepercayaan dan mazhab.

Saya bersama-sama Perzeus James membuat laporan rasmi di Balai Polis Taman Sri Muda, Shah Alam pada 8 Mei 2014 selepas berpeluang meneliti laporan berita mengenai seminar itu di beberapa portal berita dalam talian. Rujuk www.uthayasb.blogspot.com untuk maklumat.

Pada 7 Mei 2014 pula, salinan fotokopi buku atur cara seminar tersebut diberikan kepada kami oleh seorang individu yang tidak dikenali semasa kami sedang minum di sebuah restoran.

Maklumat ini juga telah kami berikan (bersama-sama salinan atur cara tersebut) kepada pegawai penyiasat jenayah, Inspektor Rohaini Baharom apabila kami dipanggil ke Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah (IPD) Shah Alam pada petang 16 Mei 2014.

Usaha terancang oleh UiTM dan Mais?

Perkara-perkara di atas juga saya dan Perzeus nyatakan kepada peguam kami, Annou Xavier dan Bernard Scott yang menjadi tempat rujukan memandangkan isu berkaitan agama adalah amat sensitif. Mereka berdua turut mengiringi kami ke IPD Shah Alam.

Seperti yang saya ceritakan kepada Rohaini, peserta seminar ternyata bukan hanya orang Islam. Pelajar beberapa sekolah menengah turut dibawa bagi memenuhkan ruang di Dewan Agung Tuanku Canselor UiTM.

Malah, fakta yang pasti tidak boleh dikatakan “terlepas pandang” oleh Mais dan UiTM adalah bahawa pelajar institusi pengajian tinggi itu sendiri terdiri daripada orang Islam (majoriti) dan Bumiputera beragama Kristian (minoriti), khususnya dari Sabah dan Sarawak.

Usahlah penganjur memberikan alasan bahawa pelajar terbabit diberikan pilihan sama ada mahu hadir atau tidak ke seminar berkenaan. Beberapa pensyarah, tutor dan pelajar UiTM yang saya hubungi mengesahkan bahawa rata-rata pelajar diwajibkan hadir.

Mereka adalah pelajar diploma dan sarjana muda yang mengambil mata pelajaran wajib seperti Tamadun Islam dan Tamadun Asia (Titas), Hubungan Etnik, serta Islam dan Agama. Kehadiran mereka ke seminar ini telah diwajibkan oleh pensyarah.

Sekiranya diperhatikan, pengendalian dan pelaksanaan seminar ini dilakukan secara terancang. Maknanya, UiTM tidak ada alasan untuk mengatakan bahawa ia tidak tahu apa yang akan berlaku dalam seminar berkenaan.

Naib Canselor UiTM, Dr Sahol Hamid Abu Bakar menjadi penaung sementara Dekan Akademi Pengajian Islam Kontemporari (ACIS) UiTM, Dr Mohamad Rahimi Osman bertindak sebagai penasihat.

Terdapat jawatankuasa yang lengkap dan nama-nama mereka dipaparkan pada buku atur cara. Memandangkan bekas perdana menteri, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi diundang sebagai tetamu khas, tentulah perancangan seminar tidak dibuat secara ala kadar.

Malah, dalam buku atur cara diakui bahawa “adalah menjadi tanggungjawab pihak UiTM bersama-sama dengan Warisan Ibnu AABY untuk mengambil inisiatif bagi menganjurkan seminar ini bagi menyebarluaskan lagi kefahaman masyarakat Islam terhadap isu (kalimah Allah) yang sedang diperkatakan serta mencari jalan penyelesaian bagi menangani masalah ini secara efektif dan menyeluruh”.

Jika benarlah itu “niat” sebenar UiTM, maka terbukti institusi pengajian tinggi itu telah “ditipu” pihak tertentu sehingga akhirnya ia menjadi platform untuk mengendalikan sebuah seminar yang secara terang-terangan berciri anti-Kristian.

Menghancurkan reputasi pusat pengajian tinggi

Mungkinkah juga akhbar Utusan Malaysia, Kumpulan Media Karangkraf, TV Al-Hijrah, Kumpulan Zikay dan Kumpulan Pantai Bharu turut “terpedaya” untuk menyokong seminar anti-Kristian ini?

Kalau kita teliti akhbar Utusan Malaysia dan Sinar Harian, liputan terhadap seminar ini tidak meluas. Mungkin mereka akhirnya menyedari kandungan, motif dan niat sebenar seminar tersebut dan memilih untuk tidak melaporkannya.

Hasil luahan perasaan masyarakat pelbagai kaum dan agama menerusi laman rangkaian sosial seperti Facebook, amat jelas bahawa rata-rata orang ramai tertanya-tanya bagaimana sebuah institusi pengajian tinggi seperti UiTM boleh melakukan “pekerjaan terhina” seperti ini yang menghancurkan reputasi dan kedudukan UiTM serta para pensyarah dan graduannya.

Kualiti pensyarah dan graduan UiTM memang sudah sedia dipertikaikan pada peringkat kebangsaan dan antarabangsa. Malah UiTM memang dikenali sebagai “lubuk” melahirkan gnerasi muda dan pemimpin masa depan yang etnosentrik, ultra kiasu, rasis dan pelampau. Maklumat ini saya peroleh menerusi komen orang ramai di pelbagai portal berita dalam talian.

(Mungkin UiTM perlu “belajar” daripada Datuk Seri Najib Razak untuk segera menyaman semua portal berita terbabit supaya orang ramai tidak akan berani lagi untuk mengkritik institusi pengajian tinggi itu sewenang-wenangnya.)

“Budak-budak UiTM yang berdemonstrasi untuk memboikot pelajar bukan Bumiputera masuk UiTM tu mesti hendak bekerja dengan majikan yang menjual pisang goreng di tepi jalan,” kata Komrad Haizal menerusi catatan di Facebook baru-baru ini dan ia menggambarkan realiti.

Memanglah kita mengalu-alukan UiTM menggunakan hak kebebasan akademik untuk menganjurkan seminar, forum, dialog dan debat berkaitan pelbagai topik yang mampu mengembangkan minda dan intelektualiti pelajar.

Akan tetapi, apa yang kini mengundang kemarahan dan kekecewaan masyarakat pelbagai kaum adalah apabila UiTM menggunakan tiket “kebebasan akademik” untuk menganjurkan seminar anti-Kristian yang ternyata tidak ada sebarang unsur “akademik” dan “intelektual” di dalamnya.

Tindakan terbaik, paling bijak dan paling waras bagi UiTM pada masa sekarang adalah dengan tampil membuat kenyataan terbuka bahawa institusi pengajian tinggi itu telah “dimanipulasi pihak tertentu” dan UiTM tidak tahu-menahu mengenai kandungan seminar berkenaan.

Apa-apa pun, apabila “lubuk perkauman” tampil mengatakan ia tidak terlibat dalam penganjuran “seminar anti-perpaduan” di tempatnya, tentulah orang tidak akan menjadi bodoh dan percaya begitu sahaja. Sebaliknya mereka akan ketawa terbahak-bahak.

Dalam pada itu, memandangkan laporan polis sudah dibuat oleh sekurang-kurangnya enam orang dan kertas siasatan di bawah Seksyen 298 dan 298A sudah dibuka di IPD Shah Alam, eloklah para penganjur dan penyokong seminar anti-Kristian itu disiasat sepenuhnya.

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Residents Protest Removal of Memorial Cross After Atheists' Complaint


BY ANUGRAH KUMAR, CHRISTIAN POST CONTRIBUTOR. Posted on 10 March 2014.

Some residents of Lake Elsinore, Calif., are protesting the removal of a cross, which was placed two years ago in honor of a young Christian man who died in an accident there, by installing smaller crosses with messages for the atheist group under whose pressure the memorial was taken down.

"What happened to our freedom," reads the message on one of the small wooden crosses that replaced the big, white cross that was set up as a memorial for 19-year-old Anthony Devaney, who was fatally struck by a car while crossing Lake Street in May 2012.

"What if this was your child?!?!" reads the message on another cross. "Ever heard the phrase to each his own?!!! Does this bother you??? Look the other way!!" says another one. "People suck!!! Get a life!!!" reads yet another one.

The mother of the deceased, Annmarie Devaney, removed the memorial cross last Thursday to avoid a conflict, as the American Humanist Association had complained to the city of Lake Elsinore saying the cross on public property was unconstitutional and a matter of separation of church and state.

"It hurts. It's like reliving the moment again, it's like losing my son again pretty much," Annmarie told ABC News. "I don't understand why they need it to come up, but me being the mom and try to keep it positive, I want to do what's right and I don't want to make it a big deal or cause a scene."

"I think they're just looking for something to complain about, really, and I think that it's petty," she told The Riverside Press-Enterprise. "The cross is there because my son's Christian, and not for any other reason. I don't know why they're doing this, but it makes me sad."

The atheist group has said it is "pleased with the city's decision to comply with the constitutional requirement of separation of church and state by removing the Latin cross from its property."

Following the removal of the cross blogger Hemant Mehta the "Friendly Atheist" wrote on the Patheos website, "These replacement crosses are far more offensive to Anthony Devaney's memory than anything the Humanists did. Where's the backlash against these people who are using an unfortunate controversy to advance their own agenda?"

Mehta says the Devaney family could build another memorial in their home or church focusing on how Anthony lived instead of where he died. "And let's see how quickly the Lake Elsinore City Council removes these distraction crosses; at this point, there should be no reason for a delay."

According to Press-Enterprise, City Councilman Brian Tisdale says he thinks the atheist group is being insensitive by requesting Devaney to remove the cross. "I think they're going a little bit overboard and being insensitive to other people's needs," he said. "This has nothing to do with city or government."

Tisdale previously headed the city's committee that planned to erect a veterans' memorial of a soldier kneeling next to a cross at the local minor league baseball stadium. The American Humanist Association challenged the veterans' memorial, and in February a U.S. district judge ruled the monument was unconstitutional and must be redesigned.

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Priest reveals proof Christians used ‘Allah’ before Merdeka


By Jennifer Gomez. Published by The Malaysian Insider on 7 January 2014.
A century-old Catholic prayer book is the latest proof that Christians in the Malay peninsula not only prayed in Malay more than 100 years ago, but also communicated with each other and the church in the language, says a priest at the centre of a new “Allah” row in Malaysia.
Catholic weekly Herald editor Father Lawrence Andrew said the 1905 publication was a Malay language prayer book and not Indonesian. "From the spelling of the words, you would see it is old Malay. And you can find the modern translation of the old Malay used in the scripture in the Alkitab," he told The Malaysian Insider.
His church and other Catholic churches in Selangor managed to avoid disruption to their Sunday services when planned protests by certain Muslim non-governmental organisations were called off over their use of the word “Allah” in the Bahasa Malaysia services.
Andrew said the prayer book quoted the First Letter of Peter, one of the verses in old Malay read: “Rendahkanlah diri mu dibawah tangan berkuasa Allah itu, sopaia dia angkatkanlah kamu di waktu katemuannha." In the Akitab, the verse read: “Oleh itu, rendahkanlah diri kamu ke bawah tangan Allah yang berkuasa, supaya Dia meninggikan kamu pada masa yang ditetapkan-Nya.”
The priest reiterated it was particularly important for Malay-speaking Christians to be able to pray in Malay, especially for those from Sabah and Sarawak who were living in the peninsula.
"There seems to be a general misconception that the use of the word is a new trend in the Christian faith, but that is not true. It has been used for hundreds of years. And this prayer book is just one example that Catholics in Malaya were praying in Malay before the British came and English was widely used, alongside Malay by the East Malaysians," Andrew said.
He said the Malay prayer book was mailed to him by the daughter of its owner not long ago.
In a hand-written note that came with the prayer book titled "Kabaktian Sahari-harian" (Daily Prayer), the sender wrote: "This book belonged to Mary De Silva who was a boarder in the convent at St Anne's church, Bukit Mertajam, around the year 1919, where this book was used. Now the book belongs to her daughter Lily De Silva who lives with her son in Penang".

Putrajaya won its case last October against the Herald at the Court of Appeal, which overturned a 2009 High Court ruling that Herald has the constitutional right to use the word “Allah”.
The church is appealing against the decision at the Federal Court.
Despite the court process, tensions have risen in the past few weeks over the church's use of the word “Allah” in its Bahasa Malaysia service, leading to the prospect of demonstrations outside churches.
It is understood more than 80 police reports have been lodged against Andrew over his remark that the word “Allah” would continue to be used in Catholic churches in Selangor.
His comments came following a statement from the new director of the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais), Ahmad Zaharin Mohd Saad, who had said that the state religious authorities would write to churches in Selangor asking them to comply with the Selangor Non-Islamic Religions (Control of Propagation among Muslims) Enactment 1988.
Andrew’s comments resulted in several Muslim groups and Selangor Umno threatening to protest in front of churches in the state on Sunday but the protests were called off at the last minute.
But not before a group of protesters burned an effigy of Andrew on Friday. Still, the priest in his Sunday sermon, called on his congregation not to fear and to remain faithful to God.
Andrew is to meet Selangor executive councillor in charge of religion, Sallehen Mukhyi, and later he will have his statement recorded by Selangor police. Yesterday, he accompanied Archbishop Emeritus Tan Sri Murphy Pakiam for a meeting with the Selangor police chief Datuk Mohd Shukri Dahlan over the recent religious conflict involving the Catholic church and several Muslim groups. Today, Andrew will have his statement recorded.

Friday, December 27, 2013

Atheism Is An Intellectual Luxury For The Wealthy


By Chris Arnade. Published by The Guardian on 24 December 2013.

They prayed whenever they could find 15 minutes. "Preacher Man", as we called him, would read from the Bible with his tiny round glasses. It was the only book he had ever read. A dozen or so others would listen, silently praying while stroking rosaries, sitting on bare mattresses, crammed into a half-painted dorm room.

I was the outsider, a 16-year-old working on a summer custodial crew for a local college, saving money to pay for my escape from my hometown. The other employees, close to three dozen, were working to feed themselves, to feed their kids, to pay child support, to pay for the basics of life. I was the only white, everyone else was African-American.

Preacher Man tried to get me to join the prayer meetings, asking me almost daily. I declined, preferring to spend those small work breaks with some of the other guys on the crew. We would use the time to snatch a quick drink or maybe smoke a joint.

Preacher Man would question me, "What do you believe in?" I would decline to engage, out of politeness. He pressed me. Finally I broke, "I am an atheist. I don't believe in a God. I don't think the world is only 5,000 years old, I don't think Cain and Abel married their sisters!"

Preacher Man's eyes narrowed. He pointed at me, "You are an APE-IEST. An APE-IEST. You going to lead a life of sin and end in hell."

Three years later I did escape my town, eventually receiving a PhD in physics, and then working on Wall Street for 20 years. A life devoted to rational thought, a life devoted to numbers and clever arguments.

During that time I counted myself an atheist and nodded in agreement as a wave of atheistic fervor swept out of the scientific community and into the media, led by Richard Dawkins.

I saw some of myself in him: quick with arguments, uneasy with emotions, comfortable with logic, able to look at any ideology or any thought process and expose the inconsistencies. We all picked on the Bible, a tome cobbled together over hundreds of years that provides so many inconsistencies. It is the skinny 85lb (35.6kg) weakling for anyone looking to flex their scientific muscles.

I eventually left my Wall Street job and started working with and photographing homeless addicts in the South Bronx. When I first walked into the Bronx I assumed I would find the same cynicism I had towards faith. If anyone seemed the perfect candidate for atheism it was the addicts who see daily how unfair, unjust, and evil the world can be.

None of them are. Rather they are some of the strongest believers I have met, steeped in a combination of Bible, superstition, and folklore.

The first addict I met was Takeesha. She was standing near the high wall of the Corpus Christi Monastery. We talked for close to an hour before I took her picture. When we finished, I asked her how she wanted to be described. She said without any pause, "As who I am. A prostitute, a mother of six, and a child of God."

Takeesha was raped by a relative when she was 11. Her mother, herself a prostitute, put Takeesha out on the streets at 13, where she has been for the last 30 years, "It's sad when it's your mother, who you trust, and she was out there with me, but you know what kept me through all that? God. Whenever I got into the car, God got into the car with me."

Sonya and Eric, heroin addicts who are homeless, have a picture of the Last Supper that moves with them. It has hung in an abandoned building, it has hung in a sewage-filled basement, and now it leans against the pole in the small space under the interstate where they live.

Sarah, 15 years on the streets, wears a cross around her neck. Always. Michael, 30 years on the streets, carries a rosary in his pocket. Always. In any crack house, in the darkest buildings empty of all other furnishings, a worn Bible can be found laying flat amongst needles, caps, lighters, and crack pipes.

Takeesha and the other homeless addicts are brutalized by a system driven by a predatory economic rationalism (a term used recently by J. M. Coetzee in his essay: On Nelson Mandela). They are viewed by the public and seen by almost everyone else as losers. Just "junkie prostitutes" who live in abandoned buildings.

They have their faith because what they believe in doesn't judge them. Who am I to tell them that what they believe is irrational? Who am I to tell them the one thing that gives them hope and allows them to find some beauty in an awful world is inconsistent? I cannot tell them that there is nothing beyond this physical life. It would be cruel and pointless.

In these last three years, out from behind my computers, I have been reminded that life is not rational and that everyone makes mistakes. Or, in Biblical terms, we are all sinners.

We are all sinners. On the streets the addicts, with their daily battles and proximity to death, have come to understand this viscerally. Many successful people don't. Their sense of entitlement and emotional distance has numbed their understanding of our fallibility.

Soon I saw my atheism for what it is: an intellectual belief most accessible to those who have done well.

I look back at my 16-year-old self and see Preacher Man and his listeners differently. I look at the fragile women praying and see a mother working a minimum wage custodial job, trying to raise three children alone. Her children's father off drunk somewhere. I look at the teenager fingering a small cross and see a young woman, abused by a father addicted to whatever, trying to find some moments of peace. I see Preacher Man himself, living in a beat up shack without electricity, desperate to stay clean, desperate to make sense of a world that has given him little.

They found hope where they could.

I want to go back to that 16-year-old self and tell him to shut up with the "see how clever I am attitude". I want to tell him to appreciate how easy he had it, with a path out. A path to riches.

I also see Richard Dawkins differently. I see him as a grown up version of that 16-year-old kid, proud of being smart, unable to understand why anyone would believe or think differently from himself. I see a person so removed from humanity and so removed from the ambiguity of life that he finds himself judging those who think differently.

I see someone doing what he claims to hate in others. Preaching from a selfish vantage point.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Church Members Mistreat Homeless Man in Church Unaware It Is Their Pastor in Disguise


Seeded by The WOPR on 18 September 2013.


Pastor Jeremiah Steepek transformed himself into a homeless person and went to the 10,000 member church that he was to be introduced as the head pastor at that morning.

He walked around his soon to be church for 30 minutes while it was filling with people for service, only 3 people out of the 7-10,000 people said hello to him.

He asked people for change to buy food – no one in the church gave him change.

He went into the sanctuary to sit down in the front of the church and was asked by the ushers if he would please sit in the back.

He greeted people to be greeted back with stares and dirty looks, with people looking down on him and judging him.

As he sat in the back of the church, he listened to the church announcements and such.

When all that was done, the elders went up and were excited to introduce the new pastor of the church to the congregation.

“We would like to introduce to you Pastor Jeremiah Steepek.” The congregation looked around clapping with joy and anticipation.

The homeless man sitting in the back stood up and started walking down the aisle. The clapping stopped with all eyes on him.

He walked up the altar and took the microphone from the elders (who were in on this) and paused for a moment then he recited,

“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.

“For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’

“Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’

‘The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ [Matthew 25: 34-45]

After he recited this, he looked towards the congregation and told them all what he had experienced that morning. Many began to cry and many heads were bowed in shame.

He then said, “Today I see a gathering of people, not a church of Jesus Christ. The world has enough people, but not enough disciples. When will YOU decide to become disciples?”

He then dismissed service until next week.

Following in the footsteps of Jesus Christ should be more than just talk. It ought to be a lifestyle that others around you can love about you and share in.

Monday, May 27, 2013

French gay marriage opponents stage big Paris march



Published by Free Malaysia Today on 27 May 2013.

Several hundred thousand opponents of same-sex marriage marched in central Paris on Sunday against a reform the unpopular French government passed last month at the price of deepening political polarization. Large park grounds around Les Invalides monument were full of protesters waving pink and blue flags, while far-right activists hung a banner on the ruling Socialist Party headquarters urging President Francois Hollande to quit.

The protests, which began as a grass roots campaign strongly backed by the Roman Catholic Church, have morphed into a wider movement with opposition politicians and far-right militants airing their discontent with Hollande. Although they have failed to block gay marriage, the protesters hope their renewed show of force will help stop or slow down further laws some Socialists want allowing assisted procreation and surrogate motherhood for gay couples.

Jean-Francois Cope, leader of the opposition UMP party, marched in the demonstration and urged young protesters to join his party to keep up pressure on the left-wing government. “The next rendez-vous should be at the ballot boxes for the municipal elections,” he said, referring to local polls due next year where conservatives hope to profit from the protest movement’s unexpectedly strong mobilization.

While the rally was peaceful throughout much of the day, police said they arrested 96 hardline opponents to the gay marriage law later on for refusing to disperse or occupying private property. Once the bulk of protesters had gone home, clashes erupted between hardliners wielding sticks and riot police, filling the Invalides Esplanade with tear gas. The violence was less severe than at the end of previous demonstrations, however. Police said 150,000 marched yesterday while protest organizers said a million people took part.

Warnings of violence ignored

Interior Minister Manuel Valls warned protesters on Saturday not to bring children along because of violence he feared after far-right militants clashed with police at recent rallies. He mobilized 4,500 police to secure the event.

Many parents ignored his warnings and some picnicked with children on the lawn at the rally. “Look, it’s perfectly safe here,” said Elisabeth Huet from Orleans, who marched along with her adult daughter and three small grandchildren.

A survey published on Sunday showed 53 percent of those polled support gay marriage and adoption, indicating a slide of about 10 points since the protests began last November. It said 72 percent thought the protests should stop now. 

Plagued by economic recession, unemployment at more than 10 percent and pressure to reduce the public deficit, Hollande got some respite on Sunday from another poll showing his record low popularity had inched up four points to 29 percent this month.

While leaders of Hollande’s Socialist Party denounced the protest against a law already passed in parliament and validated by the Constitutional Council, the conservative UMP party was split over whether to continue the rallies. There were fewer Catholic priests than at earlier demonstrations. Several bishops joined previous marches, but distanced themselves as protests became more openly political.

France’s first gay wedding is due to take place on Wednesday in Montpellier, France’s self-proclaimed capital of gay culture. France, a traditionally Catholic country, followed 13 others including Canada, Denmark, Sweden and most recently Uruguay and New Zealand in allowing gay and lesbian couples to wed.
In the United States, Washington D.C. and 12 states have legalized same-sex marriage.

- Reuters

Link: 

Thursday, January 24, 2013

If tossing pig heads into suraus won’t do it, then distribute Bibles to Muslims?



Posted on 24 January 2013 by The People's Parliament.
August, 2009, they tried to agitate the Hindu community into reacting to a cow head protest in Shah Alam.
Our  Hindu brothers and sisters did not fall for it.
January, 2010, arson attacks on churches.
Damn!
Christians also not reacting like with like.
So they decided to ‘do the dirty’ for the Christians.
UMNO / PERKASA or their paid underlings desecrated suraus.
January, 2012, 5 pig heads outside the front entrance of the Masjid Al Falah in Taman Desa Jaya, Johor Bahru. FMT has the report HERE.
And now, at the height of the “Allah” controversy, Chinese Christians distributing Bibles to Muslim students?
In Penang, at that?
“…at about 1.30pm on Jan 17, the individual who lodged the report said while he was in his office and a Malay man had informed him that bibles were being distributed outside SMK Jelutong, Lorong Sekolah.
“The complainant then went to the scene and discovered that it was true. From the information received, three Chinese men and a woman who came in a car were found distributing the bibles randomly to students after the morning school session had ended,” he added.
The complainant, who was given a Bible by one of the students, then lodged a police report at the Jelutong police station” - Penang police chief Abdul Rahim Hanafi in a statement issued two nights ago, and reported by Malaysiakini.
Firstly, I cannot imagine anyone stupid enough to, at the present time, go out in broad daylight to do this, when this controversy is still raging.
And even if you had to  do it in broad daylight, surely you’d be careful enough to not be spotted.
I mean, if we were able to ABU the ferry terminal in Labuan in broad daylight without being spotted, surely anyone wanting to carry this distribution exercise would take enough caution too?
Whether you and I and everyone else reading this and in cyberspace believes this, or sees it as an UMNO / PERKASA effort to agitate the Malays, is unimportant.
Why?
First, please see that in the Malaysiakini report, the Penang CPO said that  “Investigation papers have been referred to the state deputy prosecutor yesterday and further instructions have been received for the police to complete the probe”.
Presumably, the probe had not as yet been completed then.
And no one has as yet been charged, nor is there anything in the police statement to suggest that the alleged perpetrators have been identified.
Now do you see the mischief in the statement issued by the police?
Why, at this stage of the investigation, mention the ethnicity of the alleged distributors?
Three Chinese men and a woman.
Distributing Bibles to Muslim students.
In Penang.
I’m pretty sure that, in the end, no one will be charged.
This incident, even if it did factually take place, in my honest belief, has, like so many others in the past, been contrived by UMNO and / or PERKASA, not to impact you and I, but those who do not have access to the alternative news.
Courtesy of the police statement issued, Utusan, Berita Harian, RTM and TV3 now have enough fodder to run the story that 4 Chinese Christians were distributing Bibles to Muslim students in Penang.
And guess what?
Unless someone bothers to take the truth as we all know it to the Malay heartlands, many pakcik, makcik and adik-adik out there are going to fall for this.
You really want to see the end of UMNO / BN in Putrajaya post the 13th GE?
GET THE TRUTH OUT TO THE KAMPUNGS