Showing posts with label State Assembly. Show all posts
Showing posts with label State Assembly. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

It’s A Misconception To Think Sarawak Chief Minister Is Really Retiring

By Barry Porter and Manirajan Ramasamy. Published by Bloomberg News on 10 February 2014.

Abdul Taib Mahmud plans to retire as chief minister of Sarawak, after running Malaysia’s commodities-rich eastern state for more than three decades.

Taib, 77, intends to inform Sarawak’s head of state to of his intention to resign, Malaysia’s official Bernama news agency reported, citing the chief minister. The decision comes seven months after the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission formed a multi-agency task force to expedite investigations into claims of graft. Taib has denied corruption allegations, and press reports say he may seek to become the state’s governor.

During his 33-year rule of Malaysia’s biggest state, Taib’s government handed out concessions for logging and supported the federal government’s mega projects, including construction of the country’s largest hydroelectric dam. Oil palm plantations spread as loggers rolled back the frontiers of Borneo’s rain forest, home to nomadic people and rare wildlife such as orangutans and proboscis monkeys.

Some stocks linked to his relatives fell after the Berita Harian newspaper first reported on Feb. 5 that Taib planned to retire as chief minister and become the state’s governor. Cahya Mata Sarawak Bhd. (CMS), a construction and building materials maker, rose 3.8 percent today after declining 8.6 percent last week after the report.
‘More Powerful’

“It’s a misconception to think he’s really retiring,” said James Chin, professor of political science at the Malaysian campus of Australia’s Monash University. “When he moves up to governor, he becomes even more powerful. Certain things need his signature. He appoints the chief minister. All mining leases must be signed off by him.”

Taib and his allies control 25 Sarawak seats in Malaysia’s national parliament. That’s enough to ensure the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition falls from power should they ever choose to switch support to the opposition, said Chin. Prime Minister Najib Razak’s alliance was returned to power in May 2013 by its narrowest margin since independence in 1957.

Taib told Bernama he would step down from his current position by the end of this month. He is Malaysia’s longest-serving chief minister, in power longer than Mahathir Mohamad, who retired after 22 years as prime minister in 2003.
Important Role

“Taib is not really gone from Sarawak politics,” Ibrahim Suffian, a political analyst at the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, said by phone. “From behind the scenes or even as the new governor, he will play an important role including handling economic issues. Most important now is who will be Taib’s successor.” Opposition parties have made some inroads in Sarawak in recent years, he said.

Taib had doubled up as the state’s finance minister, and minister for planning and resource management, according to his official website. He’s also president of Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu, or PBB, and state chairman of Barisan Nasional, Malaysia’s ruling political coalition headed by Prime Minister Najib Razak.

PBB met at the weekend and gave Taib a mandate to nominate his successor, the Star reported, citing party Chairman Amar Asfia Awang Nassar.

Local media, including the Star, have named three candidates short-listed by Taib to replace him. They are the party’s deputy president Amar Abang Johari Openg, senior vice president Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hasan and information chief Adenan Satem.

To contact the reporters on this story: Barry Porter in Kuala Lumpur at bporter10@bloomberg.net; Manirajan Ramasamy in Kuala Lumpur at rmanirajan@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Rosalind Mathieson at rmathieson3@bloomberg.net

Link: 


Published by Today Online on 10 February 2014.

But Mr Taib’s influence over the sprawling Borneo island state is likely to remain strong as he is expected to take on the job of state governor, a more ceremonial role than his current post.

His departure will raise doubts over whether a successor will be able to maintain Mr Taib’s political balance between defending the interests of native Sarawak residents, and supporting the national Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition. The state is majority Christian in Muslim-majority Malaysia.

Sarawak, the country’s largest state, has been increasingly crucial to the long-ruling BN coalition as its support wanes in peninsula Malaysia. Without the 25 seats that Mr Taib’s party and his allies won in last May’s election, the national coalition would have lost its majority in the 222-seat parliament, likely ending its 57-year rule.

Mr Taib’s party emerged from the election as the coalition’s second-largest party after the ruling United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), boosting his sway over national politics.

Mr Taib has short-listed three possible successors, including his housing minister who is seen as having close ties with the federal government and Prime Minister Najib Razak.

“I think the big question is what happens over the longer term, whether his successors will develop minds of their own,” said Mr Ibrahim Suffian, head of the Merdeka Center polling firm.

Mr Taib, who travels by Rolls Royce and private jet, has been under pressure to step down amid a growing focus on alleged timber corruption in the state.

Environmental groups say that under his rule, Sarawak — which accounts for a quarter of the world’s tropical log exports - has lost 95 per cent of its virgin forest. Sarawak officials say 84 per cent of the state is forested although this includes massive oil palm estates planted in place of forests.

UNDER INVESTIGATION

Mr Taib has been under investigation by Malaysia’s anti-graft agency since 2011 and is regularly accused by activist groups of enriching his family through his control over awarding huge infrastructure contracts.

Ms Clare Rewcastle-Brown, who has long been a critic of Mr Taib and who runs the Sarawak Report website, said Mr Taib was merely “moving upstairs” into the new role and would maintain his overall influence on state affairs.

“He will never willingly give up power as it would be too dangerous for him and threaten the business empire he has built up across Sarawak,” she said.

Mr Taib is presiding over a US$100 billion (S$127 billion) plan to harness the state’s rivers into 12 dams by 2020 and transform it into an energy hub that can power smelters built by Japanese and Australian firms and also light up the rest of Borneo island.

Shares in Cahya Mata Sarawak, owned about 40 per cent by Mr Taib’s immediate family, snapped three days of losses to rise 2.5 percent today on expectations Mr Taib will still have a say in how the state awards infrastructure jobs.

Timber companies such as Ta Ann Holdings and Jaya Tiasa that benefit from logging licenses awarded by Mr Taib rose 2.3 per cent and 1.3 per cent respectively.

All the counters outperformed the broader market which inched up 0.4 per cent. REUTERS

Read more here:

Published by Free Malaysia Today on 12 February 2014.

Research by Swiss NGO, the Bruno Manser Fund (BMF), has shown that Taib’s family raised US$16.94 million (RM55.9 million) from the sale of one of his San Francisco properties. The historical 11-storey building at 260 California Street in San Francisco’s financial district was sold by Sakti in mid-2012. Sakti, a US company, is allegedly controlled by Taib via his closest family members.

Documents released by the late whistleblower Ross Boyert back in 2010 showed that 50% of Sakti’s shares were held “in trust” Taib by his two brothers – Onn and Arip – and his three children. The Swiss NGO said in a statement that Taib’s majority control of Sakti was kept a secret because the Sarawak constitution prohibits the Chief Minister from actively running commercial interests.

The constitution states that the head of government and the Governor “shall not hold any office of profit and shall not actively engage in commercial enterprise...The Sakti sale is a textbook example of money-laundering. A foreign politician who acts in an illegal and unconstitutional way should not be allowed to operate freely in the United States. The US and the Malaysian authorities have to act decisively and confiscate all Taib assets whose origin cannot be explained,” the statement said.

Read more here:

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Kumpulan Anti-Lynas mahu tahu PELAN TERPERINCI pembuangan sisa, berazam untuk berjuang hingga akhir



Oleh Ida Lim. Diterbitkan oleh The Malaysian Insider pada 17 September 2012.

Kumpulan akar umbi pergerakan kekal tidak yakin dengan janji Lynas Corporation dan Putrajaya untuk menguruskan sisa dari loji nadir bumi kontroversi pelombong Australia di Kuantan, hari ini menuntut syarikat itu mendedahkan pelan terperinci atau “akan melawan hingga saat akhir”.

Dua minggu lalu, Lembaga Pelesenan Tenaga Atom Malaysia (AELB) mengeluarkan lesen operasi sementara (TOL) bagi Lynas Corp walaupun bantahan meluas, berhujah bahawa pelombong Australia itu terikat di sisi undang-undang untuk membuang sisa radioaktif dari kilang dan mengembalikan baki ke Australia. Lynas Corp telah memohon ke Australia untuk “mengimport bahan” dari joji walaupun dasar Canberra adalah untuk menolak sisa radioaktif, kata seorang Diplomat Australia Jumaat lepas. 

Pengerusi Himpunan Hijau, Wong Tack, memberi amaran tegas kepada Lynas dengan mengatakan bahawa: “Melainkan jika anda mempunyai rancangan yang sangat jelas, kita tidak akan membenarkan anda mempunyai apa-apa untuk masuk... Rakyat telah memutuskan kita tidak mahu industri ini di negara kita.”

“Pek dan pergi atau kita akan berjuang hingga akhir,” kata Wong, walaupun kumpulan anti-Lynas yang lain gagal untuk mendapatkan kebenaran Mahkamah Rayuan untuk semakan keputusan kehakiman tentang TOL. Beliau juga berkata terdapat beberapa soalan yang tidak dapat diselesaikan: “Pelabuhan mana akan anda lalui? Bagaimana anda akan pek? Bagaimana anda akan mengangkut ia? Berapa lama mereka akan menyimpan sebelum kapal mereka kembali?"

Tan Bun Teet, pengerusi bersama Selamatkan Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL), berkata: “Adalah melucukan apabila kerajaan Malaysia mengeluarkan TOL untuk Lynas apabila kita tidak tahu bagaimana Lynas akan menguruskan sisa pepejal dan terdapat banyak isu-isu tertunggak.”

“SMSL ingin tahu setiap perincian kerana orang ramai mempunyai hak untuk tahu dan kami ingin meneliti setiap cadangan bahawa Lynas meletakkan keluar untuk memastikan mereka yang berdaya maju dan selamat.” Tan berkata bahawa “SMSL akan mengambil segala tindakan yang mungkin untuk mencuba melalui mahkamah dan ingat TOL dan untuk mengenakan tekanan politik melalui pengundi bagi menghentikan projek ini.”

Pengerusi Gabungan Hentikan Lynas (SLC), Andansura Rabu berkongsi pandangan Wong dengan mengatakan bahawa: “Kami masih mahu belajar apa yang sebenar mereka rancangkan... Kami mahu melihat rancangan terperinci apa yang mereka akan lakukan sebelum mereka dibenarkan untuk memproses dan mengendalikan.” Beliau berkata bahawa gabungan itu “ragu-ragu pelaksanaan rancangan Lynas", sama ada ia akan melibatkan mengubah sisa ke dalam perdagangan produk atau menghantar sisa kembali ke Australia.
Walaupun SLC bersetuju kepada kedua-dua idea, Andansura berkata mereka kekal tidak yakin jaminan Lynas.



Persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri Pahang hari ini diberitahu bahawa isu ancaman sianida terhadap penduduk sekitar Bukit Koman, Raub yang didakwa berpunca dari kilang Raub Australia Gold Mining (RAGM) merupakan satu agenda politik pembangkang.

Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Adnan Yaakob berkata ia bukan masalah alam sekitar sebaliknya isu politik yang sengaja digembar-gemburkan pembangkang. “Pembangkang sengaja menggunakan isu ini sebagai propaganda mereka. Ini dipelajari pembangkang dari ‘sifu’ mereka Adolf Hitler yang percaya bahawa setiap pembohongan jika diulang, orang akan percaya.

“Isu RAGM ini seperti juga isu Lynas, dimainkan pembangkang. Perkara ini yang menjadi masalah mereka. Politik menjadi teruk apabila ada ‘hantu-hantu’ yang menjadi dalang merencanakan agenda di sebalik pakatan pembangkang,” katanya.

Beliau menjawab soalan Datuk Abdul Rahman Mohamad (BN-Padang Tengku) berhubung jumlah penduduk Bukit Koman yang mengalami masalah kegatalan kulit, mata dan sistem pernafasan berikutan operasi RAGM.

Sementara itu, Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kerajaan Tempatan, Alam Sekitar dan Kesihatan, Datuk Hoh Khai Mun berkata daripada kajian didapati hanya 24.6 peratus penduduk kampung terbabit mengalami masalah berkenaan.

“Secara umumnya, mereka yang mempunyai masalah penyakit kulit antara 12 hingga 23 peratus, masalah pening 20-60 peratus, masalah mata berair antara 4-12 peratus dan masalah bernafasan 7-13 peratus. Menjawab soalan Leong Ngah Ngah (DAP-Triang) mengenai ancaman sianida yang didakwa mengakibatkan penduduk Bukit Koman mengalami masalah kesihatan, Adnan berkata kerajaan negeri sudah menjalankan kajian dibantu pakar dari institusi pengajian tinggi (IPT) sejak 2009. “Daripada kajian tersebut didapati sianida bukan punca penyakit kulit yang dialami penduduk Bukit Koman,” katanya.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Put Interest Of The Nation First

REFLECTING ON THE LAW
By SHAD SALEEM FARIQI

The Star, 20 May 2009

There are no winner-take-all solutions to the Perak political crisis, a hydra-headed monster that cannot be eliminated by ding-dong judicial decisions.

THE Perak political crisis can be likened to a malignant cancer that is voraciously spreading to the lymph nodes of our other institutions – the Sultanate, the judiciary, the federal executive, the civil service, the police, the law officers of the Crown, the court registry, the Anti-Corruption Commission and the Election Commission.

The longer we wait, the farther the affliction will spread. It is time, therefore, to stop this madness, this divisiveness, this polarisation.

There are no black and white, open and shut, or simple solutions.

The issues are so complex and so interconnected that arguments from both sides of the divide have depth and richness.

In sych a politically-charged situation, the courts cannot supply any satisfactory solutions. The judiciary is suited to resolving legal issues, not political ones.

The courts usually provide piecemeal solutions to simple, succinct questions.

But when there is a bottomless cesspool of polarising and contentious issues, no court, here or anywhere, can wipe away the discord and restore harmony and sanity.

Thus, even if after an agonizingly slow course of interim proceedings, ap peals and cross appeals there is an authoritative judicial determination of who the legitimate Mentri Besar is, a plethora of other connected is sues — each capable of toppling the apple cart — will still be left unaddressed.

Among the issues are the validity of the resignation letters by the three who opted out of Pakatan Rakat to be Independents friendly to Barisan Nasional; the unilateral power of the Speaker to declare Assembly seats vacant; and the power of the Election Commission to make a ruling on the same issue.

If there are calls for a vote of confidence on the floor of the House, the Speaker may frustrate it by disqualifying and barring 10 out of 59 members of the Assembly from attending the proceedings.

Is the Speaker subject to a restraining order from the court, or are proceedings in the Assembly immune from judicial interference?

If the result of a vote of confidence is influenced by exclusion of a large number of members, is the Sultan bound by it?

Or does he have any other way of determining the question of “confidence of the members of the Assembly”?

There are disagreements about the legal validity of the “assembly un der the tree” and the resolutions it passed.

The removal of V. Sivakumar as Perak Assembly Speaker and the installation of Datuk R. Ganesan as the new Speaker aroused deep revulsion and raised many legal issues.

The repeated dismissal and rein state ment of the Secretary of the Perak Assembly, the State Secretary and the State Legal Advisor pose ma ny queries.

Scores of local authority personnel have lost their jobs in the musical-chair manner in which governments are rising and falling in Pe rak.

Till a judicial decision is made on the validity of the removal and the rein­statement, there will be doubts about the legality of any decisions they may have made.

Partisan tactics by the police within the premises of the State Assembly raise constitutional issues of the sanctity and privileges of state as semblies.

The officers involved may one day have to appear before the Privileges Committee to answer charges of contempt.

In sum, the political crisis in Perak is like a hydra-headed monster that cannot be eliminated so easily by ding-dong judicial decisions.

Let us stop this insane and naked show of unprincipled politics.

Let us accept that in this stalemate, there are no winner-take-all solutions.

For this reason, recourse to the courts is pointless. The warring factions should negotiate and accommodate.

There are four more years to the next general election.

Barisan and Pakatan can agree to share two years each at the helm.

Alternatively, there is the political possibility of appointment of a neutral, caretaker government advising dissolution and state elections within 60 days from the date of dissolution.

There is the legal sledgehammer of federal intervention through an emergency proclamation under Arti cle 150 of the Federal Constitu tion, as happened in Sarawak in 1966 and Kelantan in 1977.

This may restore order out of chaos to pave the way for a state poll in due course of time.

The country as a whole is more important than the fate of Barisan or Pakatan in Perak.

In Rome, Nero played the fiddle while the city burned. We should not allow that to happen to us.

Perak politicians have no right to paralyse the rest of the country or to distract us from the many urgent and daunting tasks staring us in the face.

Among them are an economy reeling under the effects of the world financial turmoil, racial polarisation, the conflict between civil and syariah courts, and the deeply divisive is sue of religious conversion of minors upon one parent changing his or her religion.

The liberalisation of the economy requires deft handling. The review of such controversial laws as the ISA requires thorough con sultation and deep soul-searching. The education system is ripe for review.

Because of the shenanigans in Perak, the country is on the verge of a political precipice.

We are afraid both to climb or to fall. But the ground is slipping be neath us.

Quick action is needed.

The public is fed up with political intrigues and wishes a closure to this Perak temasya.

Perhaps the Conference of Rulers can exercise its powers under Article 38 (3) to discuss issues of national importance and to propose some via­ble solutions to the Perak crisis.

Perhaps the Yang di-Pertuan Agong can draw on his vast prerogative power to advise, caution and warn about the long-term effects of Perak to the integrity of our legal and political system.

Perhaps politically disinterested, towering personalities like Tun Musa Hitam or Tan Sri Razali Ismail could be roped in to broker peace and to stop this haemorrhaging of public trust.

We have had enough of political mudslinging and acrimony. We need to move on to the real problems and challenges of living.

Prof Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi is a Professor of Law at Universiti Teknologi Mara