Friday, September 28, 2012

Konsert BERSIH 8T – Time to renew the call for CLEAN elections



Press Statement, 27 September 2012

Five months have now passed since more than 250,000 citizens stepped forward to join the BERSIH 3.0 : Duduk Bantah event on 28 April 2012. These everyday Malaysians exercised their right to assemble in order to urge the government to clean up the electoral system.

However, it appears that the government is still unwilling to heed the voices of the people. The BERSIH 2.0 eight demands and the 22 recommendations of the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) report have yet to be fully implemented. Thus, BERSIH 2.0 is organising a fun-filled concert on 13 October 2012 at Stadium Kelana Jaya aimed at reminding the Election Commission that the 8 demands remain unfulfilled.

In the months since the historic BERSIH 3.0 peaceful assembly, the government has focused its attention on attacking the BERSIH 2.0 steering committee in various ways instead of getting down to the much-needed electoral reforms. The authorities are pursuing legal actions against the steering committee and the Kuala Lumpur City Council (DBKL) has threatened to issue hefty summons to the committee.

Despite this, BERSIH 2.0 has persisted in its efforts to raise awareness on the many instances of serious discrepancies in the electoral roll. Our work so far has been made possible because of the generous support of regular Malaysians who have donated to the cause. However, more needs to be done.

Some of the performers lined up so far are Ito, Julian Mokhtar and the Gang, Soul Saviors (the winners at Pesta Lagu Jalanan), Republic of Brickfields, punk band Dum Dum Tak punk band, Canto rock band Hui Se De Dai and Ray Cheong. There will also be BERSIH 2.0 activities for all ages to participate in and a special song by the BERSIH 2.0 Steering Committee. National laureate A. Samad Said who is a co-chairperson of BERSIH 2.0 will also read a special poem at this event.

This concert event will not only be for fundraising but will be fun and memorable and also serve as a reminder to the government leaders of their duty to heed the call for urgent reforms. Malaysians will not accept anything less than a thorough clean-up of its electoral system and we will not hesitate to come together once again to make our voices heard.

The details are as follows:

DATE               : 13 October 2012

VENUE             : Kelana Jaya Stadium, Petaling Jaya

TIME                : 6.00pm – 11.30pm

*Entry by minimum donation

KELUAR MENGUNDI, LAWAN PENIPUAN

Thank you.

Salam BERSIH!

Steering Committee

Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections 2.0 (BERSIH 2.0)

The Steering Committee of BERSIH 2.0 comprises:

Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan (Co-Chairperson), Datuk A. Samad Said (Co-Chairperson), Ahmad Shukri Abdul Razab, Andrew Ambrose, Andrew Khoo, Anne Lasimbang, Arul Prakkash, Arumugam K., Awang Abdillah, Dr Farouk Musa, Hishamuddin Rais, Liau Kok Fah, Maria Chin Abdullah, Matthew Vincent, Niloh Ason, Richard Y W Yeoh, Dr Subramaniam Pillay, Dato’ Dr Toh Kin Woon, Dr Wong Chin Huat, Dato’ Yeo Yang Poh and Zaid Kamaruddin.

Link: http://www.bersih.org/?p=5440

Thursday, September 27, 2012

RM414,000 spent on special envoys!



By Patrick Lee. Published by Free Malaysia Today on 26 September 2012.
A total of RM414,366.16 in expenses have been spent on Malaysia’s two special envoys to China (Ong Ka Ting) and India (S Samy Vellu) this year. These details were revealed by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Nazri Abdul Aziz in the Dewan Rakyat today, in response to a query by PKR-Batu MP Tian Chua over the matter.
Samy Vellu, who is serving as Malaysia’s special envoy with a ministerial rank on infrastructure to India and South Asia, apparently racked up a total overall expenditure of RM373,071 in 2012 so far.
At the same time, he was paid a monthly salary of RM27, 227.20. The former MIC president also had on staff a private secretary, special officer, two special drivers, an office secretary and a police escort.
Ong, on the other hand, appeared to rack up a smaller amount, with expenses totalling RM41,295.16 in 2012 so far. The former MCA president was also paid a monthly salary of RM20,000, and had on staff a senior and non-senior private secretary.
Nazri said that Ong himself suggested for less facilities.
Samy Vellu was appointed to his post on Jan 1, 2011 and his stint will end on Dec 31, 2012. Ong started work on Nov 1, 2011 and his appointment will end on Oct 31, 2013.
Former ministers have the edge
Tian also asked about Ong and Samy Vellu’s role as special envoys, given that Malaysia already has ambassadors to these countries.
He then asked how the government could appoint these two envoys, alleging that they were supposedly involved in matters of bribery. This query irked Nazri, who termed Tian’s allegation as slander, denying that the two had been involved in corruption of any kind.
He said that it would have been a big mistake not to use Malaysians of Chinese and Indian heritage to deal with these economic powerhouses. He said Samy Vellu was appointed because of his experience as works minister, besides his infrastructure-related connections with India.
Ong, Nazri added, shared similar connections with China. However, he said that Ong had language advantages over Malaysia’s embassy staff in China. We have an embassy there, but they [staff] are not fluent in Mandarin. But our special envoy is fluent in Mandarin, and can ease our relationship with China,” he said.
Nazri added that the envoys’ former status as ministers also gave them an edge over normal businessmen. He said that people in these two countries would prefer to meet with former ministers rather than with everyday folk.

Menteri Pertahanan: Tak perlu pihak luar siasat isu RIV

NONE
Diterbitkan oleh Malaysiakini pada 25 September 2012.

Kementerian Pertahanan tidak memerlukan siasatan oleh pihak luar berhubung isu pembelian Rapid Intervention Vehicle (RIV), kata Menteri Pertahanan Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi. Beliau berkata siasatan terperinci secara dalaman yang dijalankan sejurus selepas isu itu dibangkitkan Sultan Johor Sultan Ibrahim telah memadai bagi mencari punca kepada isu berkenaan.
    
"Maklumat awal hasil siasatan yang dijalankan telah pun saya peroleh dan setakat ini saya dapati kementerian tidak perlu kepada siasatan oleh pihak luar dalam mencari penyelesaian kepada isu ini," katanya mengulas mengenai perkembangan siasatan terhadap dakwaan Sultan Ibrahim mengenai perbezaan harga RIV yang lebih mahal daripada harga yang dianugerahkan oleh baginda.
    
"Saya sebagai menteri pertahanan mengambil tanggungjawab penuh atas keprihatinan yang ditunjukkan Sultan Ibrahim yang juga Kolonel Komandan Rejimen Gerak Khas yang membangkitkan isu ini dan saya akan pastikan siasatan dijalankan sehingga ke akar umbi," katanya kepada pemberita selepas merasmikan Simposium Tentera Laut Pasifik Barat (WPNS) ke-13 di ibunegara hari ini. 
    
Beliau berkata siasatan itu bukan sahaja mengambil kira aspek harga tetapi semua dokumen pembelian seperti spesifikasi dan pakej pembelian yang melibatkan latihan. 
    
Ahmad Zahid sebelum ini dilaporkan berkata kementeriannya tidak akan bertolak ansur, sama ada dengan syarikat pembekal atau mana-mana pegawai yang masih bertugas atau telah meninggalkan kementerian, sekiranya mereka didapati terlibat dalam sebarang penyelewengan dalam tawaran pembekalan RIV itu. 

Sultan Johor pada majlis ulang tahun Rejimen Gerak Khas ke-47 di Kem Iskandar, Mersing, Johor 8 Sept lepas dilaporkan bertitah harga RIV yang dianugerahkan oleh baginda ialah RM150,000 berbanding RM690,000 yang dijual oleh pihak pembekal. 
    
Ditanya mengenai peruntukan terhadap kementerian pertahanan yang semakin mengecil berbanding pemilikan aset yang sedang dilakukan negara jiran, Ahmad Zahid berkata ia tidak perlu dibimbangkan kerana pembelian itu lebih kepada penggantian aset lama. 
    
Ahmad Zahid berkata perbincangan beliau bersama rakan-rakan sejawatnya dari negara lain juga menunjukkan mereka tidak berniat untuk melakukan provokasi sebaliknya pembelian itu lebih kepada menggantikan aset lama serta mengikut keadaan semasa perubahan teknologi. 
    
"Rasanya kita tidak perlu bersaing untuk tingkatkan perbelanjaan pertahanan, namun kami tetap merasa bangga kerana Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak selaku menteri kewangan tetap memberikan peruntukan untuk pertingkatkan aset ketenteraan," katanya. 




10 September 2012: Perbezaan harga Rapid Intervention Vehicle (RIV) yang diutarakan Sultan Johor Sultan Ibrahim dalam titah baginda Sabtu lepas akan disiasat, kata Menteri Pertahanan Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi. Beliau berkata kementeriannya mengambil secara positif komen tersebut dengan menganggapnya sebagai satu keprihatinan yang ditunjukkan Sultan Ibrahim yang juga Kolonel Komandan Rejimen Gerak Khas. 


11 September 2012: Dewan Pemuda PAS Malaysia (DPPM) meminta kerajaan memandang serius dan menyiasat dakwaan sama ada wujudnya amalan rasuah dan ketirisan dalam pembekalan kelengkapan tentera kepada pasukan elit Kor Gerak Khas angkatan tentera... "Apa yang dizahirkan oleh Sultan Johor adalah suatu kebimbangan terhadap amalan rasuah dan ketirisan yang mungkin berlaku dan menyerap masuk dalam dalam projek membekalkan kelengkapan peralatan tentera sehingga anggota pasukan elit itu menjadi mangsanya," kata Naib Ketua DPPM, Dr Raja Ahmad Raja Yaacob.

Monday, September 24, 2012

Islam Means Peace



September 22, 2012.

The Islamic Renaissance Front views the recent murders and uproar over the film “Innocence of Muslims” with much sadness and bafflement.

All available facts suggest that “Innocence of Muslims” is not even a film. What is currently known about it was available in the widely circulated YouTube clip which ran for a total of some 13-odd minutes. What is worse, most critics are in agreement on the film’s utterly poor quality — cheap sets, mediocre actors, bad voice-overs and incomprehensible narrative — all of which explains why no one had even heard of the so-called film until Muslims decided to make a fuss about it.

Indeed, the added tragedy is not so much that the film is Islamophobic, which it clearly is, but that the unnecessary attention given to it by angry Muslims, eventually gave the film far more publicity than it deserves.

Why?

The question is why. What is behind the apparent trend of Muslim hypersensitivity? For the protests is just one occurrence out of countless others before, whereby masses of Muslims occupy public space to pressure some form of censure, punishment or banning of some product for insulting Islam. Rather than to reflect, negotiate or dialogue the tenor has often been to confront and suppress.

The most well-known case to date was the furore over Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses”. More recently there were the Danish cartoons. Even the rather well produced “The Message”, directed by Moustafa Akkad in 1976 with Anthony Quinn as the main actor, which did not portray the Prophet at all was deemed by many Muslims to be offensive. A Muslim group staged a siege against the Washington DC chapter of B’nai B’rith, threatening to blow up the building and its inhabitants under the false belief that Quinn portrayed the Prophet.

We now witnessed the needless deaths of dozens of innocent civilians as a result of violent protests that only reinforced the distorted image of Islam as a religion of violence and intolerance. It portrays the vicious face of a religion that was supposed to be a religion of peace and compassion.

The West?

When one observes the discourse closely, one will find that what underlies the narrative is a sense of defeat and insecurity upon being overwhelmed by what is often broadly termed as “the West”. This sentiment is an obvious continuation of an earlier resentment against Western colonialism, which almost all Muslim-majority countries today experienced in one form or another. Daily life in the age of globalisation too has seen an increase of presence by Western products as well as political and cultural values. Geopolitically, the presence of Western military forces in Muslim countries is all too apparent and overwhelming.

All this has somehow been viewed by Muslims as a sign that Islam is left behind, in one way or another, as a civilisation. That in turn further reinforces the anxiety of powerlessness before fearful imaginations of a monolithic behemoth called “the West”. From there, everything Islamic is juxtaposed against it, giving rise to a mood of scepticism against anything and everything that comes from the so-called “West”.

Towards openness and dialogue

But the situation is not that simple. While there has been much decline in science and learning in the Muslim world, which is undeniably tied to a history of colonial exploitation, Muslims must learn to take responsibility for the course of their own progress. Thus, rather than to recoil in defensiveness against everything Western or offensive, there must be instead, an attitude of critical reflection and openness to ideas.

Progress requires freedom, for no genuine learning can proceed when power is imposed from without on what can be said and heard. To embrace this is not to embrace or justify Islamophobic or racist sentiments. It is rather to affirm that racist or Islamophobic sentiments are best dealt with through dialogue, learning and empathy rather than brute force or coercion.

Hate must be combated. Oppression must end. But Muslims will only fail themselves if they proceed in a stupor of insecurity and anger.

Islam is a religion of patience and compassion

There is nothing in Islam that says hate must be combated with more hate. Recall, when the Prophet Muhammad was just beginning his mission, a woman placed faeces at his door in hatred of Islam. Muhammad endured the humiliation peacefully, neither choosing to retaliate in anger or violence, to exemplify that ethos of calm and compassion that defined the eventual success of Islam in Mecca.

Conservative Muslims tend to regard such instances as inevitable given that Muslims did not get in power until Medina, but they forget the historical fact that it was Muhammad’s exemplary character as a clear-headed leader in Mecca that compelled the Medinans to turn to him as an arbiter and leader for their fragmented city in the first place.

Calm and compassion needed in Malaysia too

Yesterday, thousands gathered outside Masjid Jamek Kampung Baru and the US Embassy to protest the “Innocence of Muslims”. Interestingly this saw members of the Islamist party (PAS) and the main ruling Malay party (Umno) marching for a similar cause for once, even prompting the Umno Youth chief to invite PAS to join the ruling coalition.

It is too early to say if this will lead to anything but it does reveal again an age-old fact about Malay politics, namely in how the vagueness of “Malay and Muslim unity” is used as a pretext to overlook other more concerned issues, such as socio-economic justice and multiracial solidarity. Emotions and passions reign ahead of clear-headed rationale and human values.

The Islamic Renaissance Front once again calls for all Muslims to focus on the central agenda of Islam and that is the end of oppression and the establishment of a just society whereby all citizens irrespective of race and creed are treated equally. Enough lives, time and effort have been wasted over this film. It is time to move on and wake up.

* This Islamic Renaissance Front statement carries the names of Dr Ahmad Farouk Musa, Ahmad Fuad Rahmad, Fadiah Nadwa Fikri, Rizqi Mukhriz and Ehsan Shahwahid.

Thursday, September 20, 2012

Call for ban on disability abortions after Paralympics


By John Bingham. Published by The Telegraph on 19 September 2012.

The success of the Paralympics should trigger a rethink of Britain’s abortion laws to make it illegal to terminate a pregnancy because a child will be born disabled, a coalition of campaigners and charities argues today. An alliance of pro-life campaigners and religious groups is launching a new push to restrict the 1967 Abortion Act, to prevent doctors terminating pregnancies on the grounds of physical abnormality.


In a letter to The Daily Telegraph, they describe the practice of aborting foetuses on physical grounds as a form of “eugenics”. The letter, signed by leading figures from groups such as Life and the Pro-Life Alliance, as well as the Catholic Bishops Conference of Scotland and a number of evangelical Christian groups, argues that the current law enshrines a form of disability discrimination.

Also among the nine signatories is Peter Elliott, a businessman who founded the Down Syndrome Research Foundation UK, after the birth of his son, David, in 1985. The signatories say that while pregnancies can be terminated even up to 40 weeks on physical grounds in certain circumstances, the moment the child is born a “moral volte-face” is performed and the official approach is “full of compassion”.

“The recent Paralympics made this contradiction yet more glaring,” the letter says. “The athletes produced such astonishing examples of courage and triumphs over disability that we now have to rethink what we mean by ‘disabled’ and ‘able’.”

The 1967 abortion act, as it is currently applied, allows terminations up to 24 weeks if two doctors agree that the physical or mental health of a pregnant woman is in jeopardy. After that, however, abortion is possible in cases in which there is a “substantial risk” that the child will suffer from a “serious handicap”. It is also permitted in cases where the life of the mother is judged to be at risk from the continuation of the pregnancy.

The most recent figures available show that there were 146 abortions after the 24-week limit in 2011 in England and Wales out of a total of almost 190,000. But overall there were more than 500 abortions after screening for Down’s Syndrome. The campaigners argue that this amounts to a form of eugenics – the belief that a society can be “improved” through controlled breeding to increase the occurrences of desirable characteristics.

But supporters of abortion reacted with anger saying that the term – with its Nazi connotations – was an “insult” to women who had faced agonising choices.

“Eugenic abortion is bad medicine,” the letter states. “Killing people with disabilities, rather than striving to support and care for them, is contrary to the high principles of medicine.” They insist that the “positive and civilised” approach is exemplified by the work of baby hospices and greater research into fetal conditions rather than allowing terminations.

Prof Jack Scarisbrick, founder of the anti-abortion group Life, said that the group is hoping to mobilise pro-life MPs to bring forward a private members bill in the Commons to amend the act. A simple two-clause bill could make it illegal to terminate a pregnancy after screening for conditions such as Down’s syndrome, he said. “We are very hopeful that now we can make a move from a new direction, that rather than focusing on weeks and grounds for abortion we can tackle this particular aspect which we believe we can win.

“That would send a wonderful signal across the world.”

But Darinka Aleksic, campaigns coordinator at the Abortion Rights group, said: “Every year about one per cent of abortions are carried out on the grounds of fetal abnormality. “A diagnosis of this sort places families in an extremely painful and difficult situation, which requires privacy and support as they decide whether to continue with the pregnancy.

“We believe that the decision is a matter for the parents and their doctors alone. It should not be used as a political football. “Using terms like 'eugenic abortion' is an insult to people who are faced with this difficult choice. “Pro-choice supporters respect the rights of all women, including those with disabilities, to make their own reproductive choices. We believe women are best placed to make the right decision for themselves and their families."

A Department of Health spokesman said: "There are some circumstances where the law permits an abortion beyond 24 weeks - for example where there is a substantial risk of serious physical or mental handicap. "This decision is not taken lightly. Two doctors must agree on the seriousness of the handicap, while also taking into account the facts and circumstances of each individual case.

"The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' guideline on abortion and foetal abnormality is clear that a woman needs sufficient information and time to help her understand the nature of the foetal abnormality and the probable outcome of the pregnancy so that she is able to make an informed decision about the options available to her."

Read more:

In the same week that a  Judge handed down a sentence of eight years to a woman who killed her unborn baby at 39 weeks gestation, calls have been made to end eugenic abortions in Britain. There is a link between these two stories because if the convicted mother had been able to claim that her baby had a disability – such as cleft palate or Down’s Syndrome – she would legally have been able to kill the baby right up and even during its birth.

There is also a link, as the article below points out, between our celebration of the achievements of people with disabilities and our discriminatory abortion laws which single out babies with disabilities for “special” treatment – that is, their death. This is cold blooded eugenics – for which no sentence of years in jail is handed down to those who legislated to make it legal or those who end these babies lives.

DOUBTS OVER HARVARD CLAIM OF 'JESUS' WIFE' PAPYRUS



By NICOLE WINFIELD. Published by AP on 19 September 2012.

ROME (AP) — Is a scrap of papyrus suggesting that Jesus had a wife authentic?

Scholars on Wednesday questioned the much-publicized discovery by a Harvard scholar that a 4th century fragment of papyrus provided the first evidence that some early Christians believed Jesus was married. And experts in the illicit antiquities trade also wondered about the motive of the fragment's anonymous owner, noting that the document's value has likely increased amid the publicity of the still-unproven find.

Karen King, a professor of early Christianity at Harvard Divinity School, announced the finding Tuesday at an international congress on Coptic studies in Rome. The text, written in Coptic and probably translated from a 2nd century Greek text, contains a dialogue in which Jesus refers to "my wife," whom he identifies as Mary.

Christian tradition has long held that Jesus was unmarried, although there is no reliable historical evidence to support that, King said. Any evidence pointing to whether Jesus was married or had a female disciple could have ripple effects in current debates over the role of women in the church.

Stephen Emmel, a professor of Coptology at the University of Muenster who was on the international advisory panel that reviewed the 2006 discovery of the Gospel of Judas, said the text accurately quotes Jesus as saying "my wife." But he questioned whether the document was authentic.

"There's something about this fragment in its appearance and also in the grammar of the Coptic that strikes me as being not completely convincing somehow," he said in an interview on the sidelines of the conference.

Another participant at the congress, Alin Suciu, a papyrologist at the University of Hamburg, was more blunt.  "I would say it's a forgery. The script doesn't look authentic" when compared to other samples of Coptic papyrus script dated to the 4th century, he said.

King acknowledged Wednesday that questions remain about the fragment, and she welcomed the feedback from her colleagues. She said she planned to subject the document to ink tests to determine if the chemical components match those used in antiquity.

"We still have some work to do, testing the ink and so on and so forth, but what is exciting about this fragment is that it's the first case we have of Christians claiming that Jesus had a wife," she said. She stressed that the text, assuming it's authentic, doesn't provide any historical evidence that Jesus was actually married, only that some two centuries after he died, some early Christians believed he had a wife.

Wolf-Peter Funk, a noted Coptic linguist, said there was no way to evaluate the significance of the fragment because it has no context. It's a partial text and tiny, measuring 4 centimeters by 8 centimeters (1.5 inches by 3 inches), about the size of a small cellphone. "There are thousands of scraps of papyrus where you find crazy things," said Funk, co-director of a project editing the Nag Hammadi Coptic library at Laval University in Quebec. "It can be anything." He, too, doubted the authenticity, saying the form of the fragment was "suspicious."

Ancient papyrus fragments have been frequently cut up by unscrupulous antiquities dealers seeking to make more money. An anonymous collector brought King the fragment in December 2011, seeking her help in translating and understanding it. In March, she brought it to two papyrologists who determined it was very likely authentic.

On Tuesday, Harvard Divinity School announced the finding to great fanfare and said King's paper would be published in January's Harvard Theological Review. Harvard said the fragment most likely came from Egypt, and that its earliest documentation is from the early 1980s indicating that a now-deceased professor in Germany thought it evidence of a possible marriage of Jesus.

Some archaeologists were quick to question Harvard's ethics, noting that the fragment has no known provenance, or history of where it's been, and that its current owner may have a financial interest in the publicity being generated about it.

King has said the owner wants to sell his collection to Harvard. "There are all sorts of really dodgy things about this," said David Gill, professor of archaeological heritage at University Campus Suffolk and author of the Looting Matters blog, which closely follows the illicit trade in antiquities. "This looks to me as if any sensible, responsible academic would keep their distance from it."

He cited the ongoing debate in academia over publishing articles about possibly dubiously obtained antiquities, thus potentially fueling the illicit market.

The Archaeological Institute of America, for example, won't publish articles in its journal announcing the discovery of antiquities without a proven provenance that were acquired after a UNESCO convention fighting the illicit trade went into effect in 1973. Similarly, many American museums have adopted policies to no longer acquire antiquities without a provenance, after being slapped with successful efforts by countries like Italy to reclaim looted treasures.

Archaeologists also complain that the looting of antiquities removes them from their historical context, depriving scholars of a wealth of information.

However, AnneMarie Luijendijk, the Princeton University expert whom King consulted to authenticate the papyrus, said the fragment fit all the rules and criteria established by the International Association of Papyrologists. She noted that papyrus fragments frequently don't have a provenance, simply because so many were removed from Egypt before such issues were of concern.

She acknowledged the dilemma about buying such antiquities but said refraining from publishing articles about them is another matter. "You wouldn't let an important new text go to waste," she said. 

Hany Sadak, the director general of the Coptic Museum in Cairo, said the fragment's existence was unknown to Egypt's antiquities authorities until news articles this week. "I personally think, as a researcher, that the paper is not authentic because it was, if it had been in Egypt before, we would have known of it and we would have heard of it before it left Egypt," he said.

Maggie Fick in Cairo contributed. Link: 

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

20,000 natives affected by Baram Dam to stay put



By Sulok Tawie. Published by The Sun Daily on 18 September 2012.

Over 20,000 natives, who will be directly affected by the construction of the proposed Baram Dam, will not go anywhere to be resettled, SAVE Sarawak's Rivers Network (SAVE Rivers) president Philip Ngau told reporters yesterday.

He said these natives are from 26 longhouses, above the dam site at Long Keseh, along the mighty Baram River. "A few thousand more natives from the longhouses located downstream of the dam will be indirectly affected," he said on the sidelines of a public forum on dams to be constructed in Sarawak and native customary rights land.

Ngau, whose longhouse, Long Laput, is not directly affected by the dam, said resettling these 20,000 natives will cause untold problems and miseries to them. "Where do these people go?" he asked, stating that the affected natives had not been told where they would be resettled. "Even if they have been told where to go, they have insisted that they will stay put, regardless," he said. Ngau said SAVE Rivers has asked the natives to stay put.

Borneo Research Institute of Malaysia (BRIMAS) director Mark Bujang said that it is unlikely that the government can solve the problems to be faced by these 20,000 affected natives. He pointed out that the problems faced by the people affected by the Batang Ai dam in Sri Aman Division and the Bakun Dam in Kapit Division have not be resolved.

Over 10,000 people, affected by the Bakun dam, have been resettled at the Sungai Asap resettlement scheme, but many have moved out. "The Sungai Asap Resettlement scheme is 50 % empty because many have left to go elsewhere or returned to the original places above the Bakun dam which are not submerged by the rising water," Bujang said.

"There are also others who built floating houses at the Bakun lake. There are 40 families from formerly from Long Jawe living on the floating houses. They have moved out of Sungai Asap," he said, stating that a few hundreds more families planned to build the floating houses at the lake.

Long Jawe is one of the longhouses submerged by the water of Bakun dam. According to Bujang, Sungai Asap is not a place to reside. "The government allocated three acres of land to each family. Even then the land is not suitable for farming because of the nature of soil," he said. "So, you can't plant padi or cash crop like rubber," he added. Bujang said that the state government has not been definite on when the construction of the Baram dam will start.

The RM4 billion dam, when completed, will generate 1,200MW of electricity. The dam will have a catchment area of about 41,200 hectares or 412 square kilometres of forested areas. Sarawak Energy Berhad (SEB), the state government-owned power supplier, is currently conducting comprehensive tests on the stability of the rock structure on the dam site.



Sekumpulan kira-kira 50 Orang Asal dari Baram mengadakan protes di hadapan bangunan sekretariat negeri Sarawak di Kuching semalam, membantah projek mega empangan yang akan menenggelamkan rumah panjang mereka. Mereka daripada 18 rumah panjang di Baram Hulu dan Tengah juga menyerahkan petisyen yang mengandungi lebih 1,000 tandatangan kepada Pejabat Ketua Menteri Sarawak.

Petisyen itu menyuarakan tentangan mereka terhadap rancangan membina empangan mega di Baram yang akan membanjiri kawasan tersebut seluas separuh saiz Singapura, serta menenggelamkan tanah nenek moyang mereka, rumah dan ladang-ladang di situ.

Dalam satu kenyataan semalam, Preiden Jaringan Orang Asal seMalaysia (Joas), Thomas Jalong, yang berasal dari Long Anap, Baram, berkata empangan itu akan menjejaskan kehidupan penduduk asal tempatan.

"Empangan akan pasti menenggelamkan tanah nenek moyang dengan lebih 20,000 penduduk dan dalam proses itu, ia akan mengakibatkan kami kehilangan rumah kita," katanya. Dengan itu, katanya, mereka secara tidak adil akan kehilangan tanah mereka, sumber mata pencarian dan rezeki, dan menghadapi masa depan yang tidak menentu,

Menurutnya, tanah itu bukan semata-mata sahaja menjadi sumber ekonomi bagi komuniti Orang Asal tetapi penting kepada identiti sosial, kebudayaan, kerohanian dan politik mereka.

12 empangan mega dirancang

Sementara itu, Rangkaian Selamatkan Sungai Sarawak (Save Rivers), sebuah gabungan yang dibentuk untuk menentang pembinaan 12 empangan mega yang dirancang bagi Sarawak, berkata bantahan itu diadakan untuk mendesak kerajaan mematuhi Deklarasi Pertubuhan Bangsa-Bangsa Bersatu mengenai Hak Orang Asal.

Presidennya, Peter Kallang berkata kerajaan negeri Sarawak perlu menghentikan semua kerja di atas jalan akses ke empangan kerana ia sudah pun menjejaskan masyarakat Orang Asal. Malah, wakil Jawatankuasa Bertindak Lindungi Baram, Philip Jau berkata perancangan untuk pembinaan empangan Baram tidak pernah telus.

"Mereka tidak bertanya rakyat pandangan mereka mengenai rancangan membina empangan tetapi sebaliknya telah memulakan kerja mengukur jalan masuk ke projek itu," kata Philip.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Kumpulan Anti-Lynas mahu tahu PELAN TERPERINCI pembuangan sisa, berazam untuk berjuang hingga akhir



Oleh Ida Lim. Diterbitkan oleh The Malaysian Insider pada 17 September 2012.

Kumpulan akar umbi pergerakan kekal tidak yakin dengan janji Lynas Corporation dan Putrajaya untuk menguruskan sisa dari loji nadir bumi kontroversi pelombong Australia di Kuantan, hari ini menuntut syarikat itu mendedahkan pelan terperinci atau “akan melawan hingga saat akhir”.

Dua minggu lalu, Lembaga Pelesenan Tenaga Atom Malaysia (AELB) mengeluarkan lesen operasi sementara (TOL) bagi Lynas Corp walaupun bantahan meluas, berhujah bahawa pelombong Australia itu terikat di sisi undang-undang untuk membuang sisa radioaktif dari kilang dan mengembalikan baki ke Australia. Lynas Corp telah memohon ke Australia untuk “mengimport bahan” dari joji walaupun dasar Canberra adalah untuk menolak sisa radioaktif, kata seorang Diplomat Australia Jumaat lepas. 

Pengerusi Himpunan Hijau, Wong Tack, memberi amaran tegas kepada Lynas dengan mengatakan bahawa: “Melainkan jika anda mempunyai rancangan yang sangat jelas, kita tidak akan membenarkan anda mempunyai apa-apa untuk masuk... Rakyat telah memutuskan kita tidak mahu industri ini di negara kita.”

“Pek dan pergi atau kita akan berjuang hingga akhir,” kata Wong, walaupun kumpulan anti-Lynas yang lain gagal untuk mendapatkan kebenaran Mahkamah Rayuan untuk semakan keputusan kehakiman tentang TOL. Beliau juga berkata terdapat beberapa soalan yang tidak dapat diselesaikan: “Pelabuhan mana akan anda lalui? Bagaimana anda akan pek? Bagaimana anda akan mengangkut ia? Berapa lama mereka akan menyimpan sebelum kapal mereka kembali?"

Tan Bun Teet, pengerusi bersama Selamatkan Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL), berkata: “Adalah melucukan apabila kerajaan Malaysia mengeluarkan TOL untuk Lynas apabila kita tidak tahu bagaimana Lynas akan menguruskan sisa pepejal dan terdapat banyak isu-isu tertunggak.”

“SMSL ingin tahu setiap perincian kerana orang ramai mempunyai hak untuk tahu dan kami ingin meneliti setiap cadangan bahawa Lynas meletakkan keluar untuk memastikan mereka yang berdaya maju dan selamat.” Tan berkata bahawa “SMSL akan mengambil segala tindakan yang mungkin untuk mencuba melalui mahkamah dan ingat TOL dan untuk mengenakan tekanan politik melalui pengundi bagi menghentikan projek ini.”

Pengerusi Gabungan Hentikan Lynas (SLC), Andansura Rabu berkongsi pandangan Wong dengan mengatakan bahawa: “Kami masih mahu belajar apa yang sebenar mereka rancangkan... Kami mahu melihat rancangan terperinci apa yang mereka akan lakukan sebelum mereka dibenarkan untuk memproses dan mengendalikan.” Beliau berkata bahawa gabungan itu “ragu-ragu pelaksanaan rancangan Lynas", sama ada ia akan melibatkan mengubah sisa ke dalam perdagangan produk atau menghantar sisa kembali ke Australia.
Walaupun SLC bersetuju kepada kedua-dua idea, Andansura berkata mereka kekal tidak yakin jaminan Lynas.



Persidangan Dewan Undangan Negeri Pahang hari ini diberitahu bahawa isu ancaman sianida terhadap penduduk sekitar Bukit Koman, Raub yang didakwa berpunca dari kilang Raub Australia Gold Mining (RAGM) merupakan satu agenda politik pembangkang.

Menteri Besar, Datuk Seri Adnan Yaakob berkata ia bukan masalah alam sekitar sebaliknya isu politik yang sengaja digembar-gemburkan pembangkang. “Pembangkang sengaja menggunakan isu ini sebagai propaganda mereka. Ini dipelajari pembangkang dari ‘sifu’ mereka Adolf Hitler yang percaya bahawa setiap pembohongan jika diulang, orang akan percaya.

Isu RAGM ini seperti juga isu Lynas, dimainkan pembangkang. Perkara ini yang menjadi masalah mereka. Politik menjadi teruk apabila ada ‘hantu-hantu’ yang menjadi dalang merencanakan agenda di sebalik pakatan pembangkang,” katanya.

Beliau menjawab soalan Datuk Abdul Rahman Mohamad (BN-Padang Tengku) berhubung jumlah penduduk Bukit Koman yang mengalami masalah kegatalan kulit, mata dan sistem pernafasan berikutan operasi RAGM.

Sementara itu, Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kerajaan Tempatan, Alam Sekitar dan Kesihatan, Datuk Hoh Khai Mun berkata daripada kajian didapati hanya 24.6 peratus penduduk kampung terbabit mengalami masalah berkenaan.

“Secara umumnya, mereka yang mempunyai masalah penyakit kulit antara 12 hingga 23 peratus, masalah pening 20-60 peratus, masalah mata berair antara 4-12 peratus dan masalah bernafasan 7-13 peratus. Menjawab soalan Leong Ngah Ngah (DAP-Triang) mengenai ancaman sianida yang didakwa mengakibatkan penduduk Bukit Koman mengalami masalah kesihatan, Adnan berkata kerajaan negeri sudah menjalankan kajian dibantu pakar dari institusi pengajian tinggi (IPT) sejak 2009. “Daripada kajian tersebut didapati sianida bukan punca penyakit kulit yang dialami penduduk Bukit Koman,” katanya.

Detained in Kamunting for opposing rare earths plant #StopLynas


By Koh Jun Lin. Published by Malaysiakini on 17 April 2012.

Chemical engineering professor Tan Ka Kheng was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) for fighting against the Bukit Merah rare earths plant in 1987, but that did not stop him from being involved in another similar campaign 25 years later.

Now an academician at a local private college as well as a researcher with the Save Malaysia Stop Lynas (SMSL), Tan has been actively speaking out against the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (Lamp) in Gebeng, Pahang.

He has made frequent appearances at public forums on Lynas and was among the experts who reviewed the Lynas documents - the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Radiological Impact Assessment (RIA) reports - when they were displayed for public viewing.

But more than three decades ago, the same efforts against the Asian Rare Earth (ARE) plant saw him become the first people to be nabbed under Operasi Lalang in 1987. "I asked the Special Branch (SB) during my interrogation, ‘why did you arrest me?'" recounted Tan in an interview with Malaysiakini.

The reply came, "Because you are a mastermind. You are in this Bakun (Dam) committee, PSG (Papan Support Group) chairperson, (founded the theatre group) Pentas... Your hands are everywhere."

Tan was then vice-chairperson of the Environmental Protection Society of Malaysia (EPSM), held a master's degree in environmental engineering from University of California in Berkeley, United States, and was a lecturer at Universiti Pertanian Malaysia (UPM, now known as Universiti Putra Malaysia).

"We came to know about this problem in Papan, Perak - the dumpsite," he explained, referring to the area earmarked for storage of the radioactive waste from the Asian Rare Earth (ARE) factory in Bukit Merah, Perak. "We realised their (villagers') problem... first of all, they were local grassroots people. Only a few of them could speak English; they did not know how to deal with the media.

"Then, of course, the government was very oppressive, it was during the (then prime minister Dr) Mahathir (Mohamad's) ‘white terror' period. "So we sourced materials, such as information about radiation and the plant. It so happened that both of these issues fall under my discipline," Tan said.

An eco-warrior in the making

In May 1984, the Papan Support Group (PSG) was formed to oppose the ARE with Tan as its chief. The PSG was a coalition of some 20 NGOs, among them Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (Abim), Federation of Malaysian Consumers Associations (Fomca) and the Malaysian Trades Union Congress (MTUC).

"At the time I was elected chairperson of PSG, I knew that they (the police) would come. I would have to go in (to prison). In our activities, we have no reservations. We fight for justice, we fight for environmental protection," Tan recalled.

The following years saw many protests being held against the Papan dumpsite and the ARE plant, and several of them had thousands of protesters taking part, including one 1,500-strong hunger strike against the dumpsite in December 1984, and a protest of 10,000 people against the ARE in April 1987. Some of these resulted in clashes with the police.

In addition, PSG brought in foreign experts to review the dumpsite, such as American epidemiologist Rosalie Bertell and Japanese geneticist Sadao Ichikawa, both of whom deemed the area hazardous.

"Simultaneously (around 1985), Mahathir was dreaming his grandiose idea of building this dam in Bakun, Sarawak. I also chaired a committee of various NGOs... to support the tribal people of Sarawak in opposing the project," Tan said.

In the months leading up to Operasi Lalang, Tan began to notice that his telephone connection began deteriorating, raising suspicions that his phone was being tapped. "One day, a man with Telekom Malaysia uniform came and said he wanted to repair my phone. I looked at him and said, ‘you don't look like you are a technician'. "He ran away!" Tan laughed. He later recognised the ‘technician' as one of his Special Branch interrogators. "I can't remember how it (the ISA arrests) came about, but generally we can see it coming. So we even held this ‘last supper'. He said during the supper about two months prior to the arrests under Operasi Lalang, those attending - at least 12 of them - made their parting requests, such as asking their friends to bring reading materials to prison. However, Ka Kheng does not remember what he said. "It was too long ago. I only remember this grand last supper. Good wine, good food, a lot of singing...," he said.

First to be arrested during Operasi Lalang

About 1am on Oct 27, 1987, as Tan was sleeping at his house before taking a flight to Singapore to discuss a business plan with his former employer, police came knocking on his door. The next day, newspapers announced his arrest and that of 18 others - it was the beginning of Operasi Lalang.

Tan was first taken the Petaling Jaya district police headquarters for a few hours, then to an unknown detention centre where he was kept in solitary confinement for 60 days. To this day, he can only guess at the location of the detention centre. "They had four-hour shifts for the interrogators. Every four hours they would change interrogators. They're fresh and you're bloody tired. They'd come up with so-called new evidence, new allegations or new questions," Tan said of his interrogation.

It was during his interrogation that he found out that he was the first to be arrested during Operasi Lalang, out of a total of 106 individuals detained. Tan was also accused of being the second-in-command of the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), and of attempting to revive its auxiliary wing, the ‘United Front', in an effort to overthrow the government.

"I said, ‘I am not so strong, sorry. I am not that powerful. I am only a weakling, just a scholar. It's just that I am very clear-minded. Right is right; wrong is wrong,'" the environmental activist recalled his response to his interrogators. "They accused me of starting Pentas, like an old-style communist cultural group, which was also not true.

"They said Pentas worked with this Filipino theatre group that was a subversive group, and that Filipino President Corazon Aquino wrote a letter to Mahathir to support my case," Tan explained. He was eventually slapped with a two-year detention order and sent to the infamous Kamunting Detention Camp near Taiping in Perak. During his interrogation, he said, the interrogators sometimes slammed their palms on the table and on one occasion threatened to crush his testicles if he did not cooperate.

'We're just moving the fence'

However, Tan was eventually released on the evening of Aug 25, 1988, serving only eight months of his detention order. "When I left, the Special Branch officer told me, ‘Tan, when you go out, don't think that you are free. We're just moving the fence,'" he said. He said he continued to be followed by people he believes were with the police, but the surveillance stopped after a while.

That is, until Himpunan Hijau 2.0 on Feb 26 this year, when he found a foreign object in his mobile phone's USB port. While his 303 days of incarceration under Operasi Lalang has not dampened his spirit as an eco-warrior, the prospect of history repeating looms over him like a dark cloud.

Tan believes that an Operasi Lalang 2.0 is possible. "Najib (Prime Minister and Umno president Najib Abdul Razak) is not in a commanding position (within Umno). He has to do something drastic. "If he follows the example of Mahathir, that is to go for massive arrests again, it could stop some Umno leaders from opposing him.

"It's not far-fetched. The situation of Umno politics now has gone back to 1987. The only difference now is that we have four states under Pakatan Rakyat." However, Tan is unmoved by the possibility of a second detention.

"If they detain me, other people will continue (the fight). We will win because truth is on our side," he said.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Open Letter to the PM on forest conservation


FMT LETTER: From Lim Teck Wyn, via e-mail. Published by Free Malaysia Today on 14 September 2012.

Dear Sir,


Politics, race and religion tend to be divisive but all Malaysians can unite around our beautiful natural heritage, our green environment and lush rainforests. It is thus worth examining this year’s Merdeka theme “Janji Ditepati” (Promises Fulfilled) from the perspective of nature conservation.

To start with, we rightly celebrate that the British kept their promise to grant us our independence and we have steered the course of our own development over the last 55 years.  However, human development has not been without cost to the natural world and our growing cities, agriculture and infrastructure all have taken a toll.

Recognising the need to strike a balance, former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir, pledged to keep 50% of Malaysia’s land area under forest cover. This promise was made to the leaders of the world assembled at the first Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992.

Today, the official statistics suggest that we still have 56% of our forest intact.  However, independent satellite analysis reveals that this figure includes plantations and the true area of natural forest is 14,962,000 hectares, which is only 45% of our land area.

In Rio we also signed the Convention on Biological Diversity, pledging to conserve our plants, animals and their habitats. Today, however, the rhino, the banteng and the leatherback turtle are no longer found in Peninsular Malaysia.

The call of the Burung Merak (the green peacock) is no longer heard on our shores. The last remaining stands of the Pokok Damar Hitam (Shorea kuantanensis) have been cleared for a Felda plantation and this tree species has now been declared to be extinct.

Scores of other Malaysian endemics are classified as critically endangered by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and are thus on the verge of extinction. Even the wild population of our national mascot, the Malayan Tiger, has dwindled to less than 500 and they continue to face serious threats from rampant poaching and the continued destruction and fragmentation of their forest home.

Unfortunately, even the remaining forest constituted in “permanent” reserves is not safe from the chainsaw, the bulldozer and the expansion of the concrete jungle.  Wildlife reserves, forest reserves and state parks are routinely cleared to make way for the relentless expansion of civilisation.

On Aug 27, 2005, you officiated the launch of the Selangor State Park whereby the government promised to “conserve and nurture” the forest for future generations.  However, there is now a plan to build a highway right through this heritage park.

The Highways Authority proposes to destroy hundreds of hectares of forest in the Selangor State Park in order to build the East Klang Valley Expressway (EKVE).  The plan is for this route to be the final section of the Kuala Lumpur Outer Ring Road (KLORR), linking Cheras with Bukit Antarabangsa and hopefully alleviating jams on the MRR2.

However, the proposed alignment of the highway would cut through the Ampang Forest Reserve -ma water catchment area that was gazetted as far back as 1912 in order to protect the Ampang water intake point which is a source of fresh water for the Klang Valley.

The protection of the Selangor State Park is also important for flood mitigation.  It has been reported that the flash flood on March 8, 2012 forced hundreds of Ampang residents to evacuate their homes and caused damage exceeding RM10 million.

The proposed EKVE may lead to or exacerbate future floods which are becoming a significant problem in the Klang Valley which has already experienced eight serious floods this year. In keeping with the theme of Janji Ditepati, now is the time for the federal and state governments to make good on the pledge to conserve our forests.

Let’s act now and ensure that we keep all forest reserves covered by natural forest, put a halt to the excision of reserves and create new totally protected areas.  In particular, let us protect Ampang Forest Reserve and make sure that any highway would not damage the forest.

In our pursuit of development, let us honour the promises we have made to future generations in Malaysia and in the world. In this way we can celebrate our independence with pride.

The writer is Hon Secretary of the Malaysian Nature Society.

Friday, September 14, 2012

Does 'Sam Bacile' – the person allegedly behind the film that has triggered violence in Libya – even exist?



By . Published by The Telegraph on 13 September 2012.

A deepening mystery surrounds the personage of "Sam Bacile": the film-maker who allegedly made “Innocence of Muslims”, a film about Islam (which curiously few people seem ever to have watched in its entirety), the crudely insulting "trailer" for which has triggered such a violent reaction in Libya and elsewhere. "Bacile", which seems to be a pseudonym, reportedly described himself to the press as an "Israeli Jew" who lives in California and worked in real estate.

Israel says it has no record of anyone under that name: indeed, a spokesman for the Israeli foreign ministry described the film-maker as "a complete loose cannon and an unspeakable idiot". A consultant on the film, Steve Klein, said that "Bacile" was neither Israeli nor Jewish and that he did not even know his real name, but that those involved in the production had anticipated that it would cause unrest: “We went into this knowing what was probably going to happen.” Well, not quite everyone, it seems. The actors and actresses appeared to think they were taking part in another kind of production entirely, and have now found themselves caught up in a horrific international controversy.

Does "Sam Bacile" even exist? Inquiries have led to Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, a Coptic Christian living in California who has been convicted of bank fraud and who admits involvement in the film, but denies that he is "Bacile". Perhaps, in the weeks to come, he and Mr Klein may be able to enlighten the public further.

Of course, the blame for the attack on the US consulate at Benghazi which killed four US citizens – including the US Ambassador Chris Stevens – rests with those who carried it out. Of course, in an ideal world, individuals would be free to say even deliberately unpleasant and insulting things about any religion without inciting a murderous response.

But we live in the real world, and the Middle East is a political powder-keg, already rendered even more unstable than usual by civil war in Syria, the collapse of long-standing regimes in Libya and Egypt, and the international intensification of tension about Iran’s nuclear programme. What the makers of the trailer for "Innocence of Muslims" – rather like their fellow-traveller, the Florida pastor Terry Jones who made a stupid show of Koran-burning – have done is to throw a match into that powder-keg, igniting a blaze which has devoured other people.

There is a clear difference between displaying courage in facing down extremist interpretations of Islam (one thinks of Salmaan Taseer, the late Governor of the Punjab, who was murdered after he opposed Pakistan's blasphemy laws) and making a crude, deliberately inflammatory attack upon the religion itself. The former is the action of of a brave individual, and the latter of a dangerous clown playing with fire. We should not be tempted to mix them up.


Related reports:

Sam Bacile/Bassel is not an Israeli-American, and his attempt to pass himself off as one is a potentially deadly slander. His film—if there really is any footage beyond the 14-minute clip—did not cost anything like $5 million to make. There is no cabal of Jewish donors who put up the money. Sam Bassel, or whoever used that name as a Facebook alias, speaks and writes fluent Arabic and likely has an Egyptian background. The name Abanob Basseley is, as one Egyptian friend tells me, as typically Coptic as, say, Mohammad is Muslim or Shlomo is Jewish. (St. Abonoub is a Coptic saint named after an Egyptian child martyred by the Romans.) The fact that the film was publicly promoted by Morris Sadek, the head of the National American Coptic Assembly, also suggests a Coptic connection to the film.


Public records searches by TIME and others have yielded nothing tangible about a Sam Bacile in California, leading many to conclude that the name is a pseudonym. The Israeli government said it had no record of Bacile as a citizen. Steve Klein (see below), a backer and purported consultant on the film, told The Atlantic he was neither Israeli or Jewish. “This guy is totally anonymous. At this point no one can confirm he holds Israeli citizenship and even if he did we are not involved,” Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor told CNN.