Monday, October 26, 2009

Ghosts Of Murders Past



Asia Sentinel, 26 October 2009.

Getting Away with Murder in Malaysia

It's best to be connected to the ruling national coalition

On July 16, according to the testimony of a Thai pathologist, Teoh Beng Hock, a 29-year-old aide to an opposition politician, was probably beaten during a marathon questioning session, sodomized, strangled unconscious, dragged to a window of the Malaysia Anti-Corruption Commission in Kuala Lumpur and thrown to his death.

The country's law enforcement establishment maintains that Teoh committed suicide by leaping from the MACC building after the inquiry was concluded into irregularities in his boss's accounts. But it is far from the first "suicide" in custody and what happened to Teoh happens all too frequently when the luckless collide with the powerful in Malaysia. His real killers are unlikely ever to be identified. As many as 350 people have died in custody since 1990. The privileged are rarely brought to trial.

The most infamous recent case before Teoh's is that of Altantuya Shaariibuu, a 28 year-old Mongolian translator who was murdered in 2006 by two bodyguards of then-Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. Altantuya had been jilted by Najib's best friend, Abdul Razak Baginda, and was demanding money from him.

Although numerous witnesses and evidence connected Najib to the affair, he was never questioned or put on the witness stand, nor was his chief of staff, Musa Safri, who Baginda said in a cautioned statement he approached about getting Altantuya from ceasing her harrassment. His two bodyguards were convicted of the murder although one, in his confession, said the two men were to be paid RM100,000 to kill her. The court never asked who would pay the money. The confession wasn't allowed in court. Baginda was acquitted without having to put on a defense and promptly left the country and Najib was eventually named Prime Minister.

Such questionable cases go back to at least the early 1980s when Sultan Mahmud Iskandar of Johor was dubbed the "killer king" by the British tabloids after he shot a trespasser to death on his property. He also reportedly assaulted and killed a golf caddy who was said to have laughed when the sultan missed a golf stroke and he maimed the caddy's brother. He later was alleged to have assaulted and injured a hockey coach, kicking off a constitutional crisis that led to former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad's removal of legal immunity from prosecution for all of Malaysia's nine sultans, although Iskandar was never either arrested or jailed.

There are plenty more. In 1988 an attractive young woman named Mustakizah Jaafar, who owned a video rental business in Malacca, was found hacked to death by unknown assailants. Mustakizah reportedly was pregnant at the time of her death. She was believed to be having an affair with Megat Junid Megat Ayob, the onetime UMNO deputy home affairs minister, who died in January 2008 of cancer.

No one was ever charged with Mutakizah's murder. The widespread gossip about Megat Junid's connection with Mustakizah didn't do his political career any harm. He was ultimately named Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister in 1997 although he lost his parliamentary seat two years later and retired from politics.

In 2002 the decomposed body of Haslezah Ishak, the attractive young second wife of Raja Jaafar Raja Muda Musa, second in line to the throne of Perak, whom he had met in a karaoke lounge, was found under a bridge, clad in a bra and jeans. Four men, including a palace aide, a bomoh or witch doctor, a fisherman and a carpenter were arrested and jailed for the murder. No one was ever arrested or questioned for hiring them to kill her although suspicion fell on the prince's wife, Rajah Mahani, who had been publicly consulting witch doctors over her suspicion that Haslezah had put a spell on her husband.

In 2003, another attractive young woman, Norita Shamsudin, was found murdered in an apartment in a Kuala Lumpur suburb. A night club guest relations officer, Norita had been rumored to be having an affair with Shahidan Kassim, then chief minister of the state of Perlis. Although another individual was arrested and charged with the murder, he was later declared not guilty and no one else was ever charged. According to local news reports, the inspector general of police, Mohd Bakri Omar, classified the case under Malaysia's Official Secrets Act and no details were ever released.

Earlier this year, authorities finally completed an inquest into the 2007 death of beautiful ethnic Indian actress Sujatha Krishnan, who also worked part-time as a secretary to S.Vell Paari, chief executive officer of Maika Holdings and the son of S. Samy Vellu, the head of the Malaysian Indian Congress, a component of the ruling national coalition. Sujatha died in a hospital in a Kuala Lumpur suburb of Klang three days after she had been rushed in for treatment. Her body was cremated almost immediately after her death. The coroner ruled she had died after poisoning herself by drinking poison. The family vainly requested an investigation into her death.

For those at the bottom end of Malaysia's power spectrum, life can be considerably tougher if suspicion falls on them. According to the reform organization Malaysians Against Death Penalty and Torture (MADPET), a distressing number of suspects have died in custody. "Relying merely on data provided by the government, it has been disclosed that there have been 150 deaths from 1990 until 2004 (10.7 per year), 108 deaths between 2000 and 2006 (18 per year), and, 85 deaths between 2003 and 2007 (21.25 per year)," the organization said.

According to a 2003 report by the Asian Human Rights Commission – the same year Norita was killed ‑ statistics released in Malaysia's parliament in October of that year by the Home Ministry, showed 23 people died in police custody between 2002 and July 2003. Of those, 16 died in 2002 although according to the report, other figures indicated that 18 had died in custody in the first nine months of 2002 alone. Parliament was told in October 2002 that a total of 34 persons had died in police custody since 2000 ‑ six in 2000, 10 in 2001 and 18 from January to September 2002.

According to the report, then-Deputy Home Minister Chor Chee Heung denied that methods of torture used to obtain information from suspects led to their deaths. He claimed that the majority of deaths were the result of attempts to escape from police custody. Typical seemed to be the case of Hasrizal Hamzah, who had been detained on suspicion of murder in October of 2003. According to a senior assistant police commissioner, Harizal confessed to the murder and then, as he was being moved to a new location, supposedly shoved the accompanying policeman aside despite being handcuffed, and leapt over a balcony to his death.

Earlier this year, the Indian community was enraged by the death of a 22-year-old named Kugan Ananthan who was detained on Jan. 15 on suspicion of stealing luxury cars. He reportedly collapsed during questioning and died on Jan. 20 from "acute pulmonary edema," or fluid in the lungs. However, after his body was released to his family, an autopsy found that he had suffered from internal bleeding in his heart, left lung, spleen, kidneys and scalp area. The soles of his feet had been beaten and the back of his neck and spine area were bleeding. His back was covered with contusions, beating marks and bruises. He had sustained more than 10 serious burn marks, probably as the result of being burned by a heated v-shaped iron bar. He had also been starved during the entire time he was being tortured, allegedly by as many as seven police officers, his family charged.

"There is a clear lack of supervision, medical care and concern for the general well-being and rights of suspects while under police remand," the Human Rights Commission said in its 2003 report. It does not appear that anything has changed. The odds are that the cases involving both Kugan and Teoh will end up the same way scores of others have.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

Two From Galilee: A Story About Life's Purpose


The Nut Graph 23 Oct 09 : 3.25PM
Compiled by Nick Choo

CHORAL group The Canticle Singers presents a fresh restaging of Two From Galilee, a musical written by Robert Sterling and Karla Worley, in Kuala Lumpur from today, 23 Oct to 1 Nov 2009.

Two From Galilee is the fictitious account of the Biblical characters Mary and Joseph, a young couple in love who are forced to deal with circumstances beyond their expectations. Confronted with a hostile world and a heavy responsibility, they fight to fulfill their dreams despite being fraught with doubt and shame. Life, they learn, is more than just about love — it is about purpose.

Despite the religious source material, musical director HK Chong is confident that the show will appeal to a wide audience. "There will always be quarters who will see it as religious ... [but] you will find many novels, plays or musicals that are built around folklore, legends and historical events. Biblical events are also historical."

The show is based on a novel of the same title by Marjorie Holmes, which was on the New York Times 1972 bestseller list and one of the top 10 bestselling novels that year. The musical played at the Peter J Sharpe Theatre atSymphony Space on Broadway in 2006, and has since been staged in many countries.

Two From Galilee runs at Panggung Bandaraya, Jalan Raja, Kuala Lumpur. Tickets are priced at RM38 and RM58 and can be purchased through Axcess (Tel: 603 7711 5000).

Net proceeds from the production will go to the St Barnabas Home for Children and The Tondo Community Project, in aid of the transient community living at a garbage site in Tondo, Manila.


Friday, October 23, 2009

Press Release: Upholding and Enforcing the Solicitors’ Remuneration Order

Friday, 23 October 2009 04:40PM








It was reported in the New Straits Times on 13 October 2009 that the Real Estate and Housing Developers’ Association Malaysia (REHDA) had issued a statement that:

• Property developers have asked the government to ease the rules on legal fees for property deals to boost the industry;
• Solicitors and clients should be allowed to negotiate freely on a legal fee that is fair and reasonable without being governed by any regulation and on a willing buyer, willing seller basis;
• In line with the government’s move towards a liberalised market, the abolishment of the scale legal fees will have a positive impact on the housing and property industry;
• Such a move will lower the cost of acquisition and would spur greater buying interest in the market; and
• There are lawyers who want to see the rules liberalised so that they can be more competitive.

The Bar Council wishes to respond accordingly and to state that the primary purpose of a fixed scale of fees for property transactions is to set a benchmark to establish a reasonable level of remuneration, commensurate with the provision of professional services of an acceptable and recognised standard.

The Malaysian Bar is not the only profession governed by scale fees as scale fees are an accepted and common method of charging for professional services in Malaysia. On 20 January 2006, in a joint memorandum signed by several professional bodies and boards on scale fees, the Bar Council together with the:
• Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia;
• Association of Valuers & Property Consultants in Private Practice;
• Board of Town Planners Malaysia;
• Institution of Engineers Malaysia;
• Institution of Surveyors Malaysia;
• Malaysian Institute of Architects;
• Malaysian Institute of Planners; and
• Malaysian Medical Association;
jointly affirmed and declared that:
• Professional services are intellectual and creative products, and not commodities;
• It is not in the interest of the public or the various professions, for professional fees to be decided entirely by “market forces”;
• In a “free market situation”, it is often too tempting for consumers requiring professional services to seek out the cheapest, sidelining the issue of quality of service, in particular when such quality is not immediately or easily discernible;
• “Shopping around" or "marketing for cheaper fees" will lead to an unhealthy widespread undercutting of professional fees;
• When fees are uneconomic and are not commensurate with the level of the services that ought to be provided, it is not uncommon for the quality of professional services rendered to be compromised;
• Scale fees will not only benefit but will also protect the consumers since, with scale fees, professionals will then have to compete with one another on the quality of professional services, and not on pricing;
• The scale fees system prevents both overcharging and undercutting, and protects consumers by promoting high quality professional services; and
• It is necessary and desirable for scale fees to be maintained and effective, and stringent measures must be taken by the various professional bodies and boards to enforce their scale fees against their members in order to ensure and preserve high standards of the professional services rendered to the public.

In October 2005, REHDA had made a similar representation to the government to intervene on scale fees and the no discount rule. On that occasion, the government had requested the Bar Council to respond to REHDA’s representation and the Bar Council had explained in great detail to the government the reasons why scale fees and the no discount rule ought to be maintained.

The Bar Council wishes to state that it is clearly provided in the scheduled agreements applicable for housing accommodation that each party shall pay his or her own legal fees. Payment of scale fees by homebuyers has never been an issue, and the Home Buyers Association of Malaysia fully supports the scale fees charged by solicitors for property transactions. The Bar Council believes that scale fees and the no discount rule are thorny issues for REHDA for the following reasons:
• Developers want homebuyers to appoint solicitors who are on their panel;
• Developers want to pay the fees of the solicitor for the homebuyer; and
• Developers want to dictate the amount of such fees.

The Bar Council views the above as a very unhealthy practice and had recently ruled that a solicitor acting for a homebuyer shall not receive his remuneration for the transaction from the housing developer. The Bar Council is of the view that developers should focus on their business of providing high quality housing accommodation to homebuyers, and developers should allow homebuyers to engage or appoint their own solicitors, and further allow the homebuyers to pay their own legal fees. The Bar Council is determined to uphold and enforce the Solicitors’ Remuneration Order as mandated by its general body.

Tony Woon Yeow Thong
Treasurer
Malaysian Bar
23 October 2009
The Malaysian Bar

Friday, October 16, 2009

Rights Of The Unborn


















The StarOnline, 15 October 2009
By Wong Fook Meng

SOME 42 million induced abortions are performed worldwide every year, which translates to one in five pregnancies ending in abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute (see http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_IAW.html).

The rise in the number of abortions is viewed with concern by pro-life groups who see the staggering statistics as nothing less than genocide.

As for pro-choice groups, they continue to push for legal reforms and societal changes to ensure that abortions are safely performed by competent medical professionals.

The raging debate on abortion centres on the seemingly competing rights of women to make choices in regard to their bodies on the one hand and the rights of the unborn child to be brought into this world on the other.

Pro-choice groups emphasise the reproductive rights of women. They argue that the ability of a woman to have control over her own body, including whether to continue a pregnancy, is a critical part of human rights.

After all, the decision of terminating a pregnancy is going to impact a woman the most, and as such she should be given the freedom to make the choice.

Also, legalising abortions will reduce the number of illegal abortions, which are often performed in unsafe and life threatening conditions.

Furthermore, pro-choice groups advance the point that mothers and families will suffer intolerable strain if unwanted pregnancies come to term, especially in certain cases of teen pregnancies, unmarried couples, adultery, rape and incest. If pregnancies cannot be terminated, this will lead to a rise in poverty, hunger, disease and overcrowding.

On the other hand, those who oppose abortion focus on the rights of the unborn child or “growing baby” as a human being with an inherent right to life. The fetus is seen as an independent human being and is not a disposable part of a woman’s body and therefore is not subject to a woman’s absolute control.

While they recognise women’s reproductive rights on whether to have a baby or not, pro-life groups maintain that the time for a woman to exercise her rights, assuming that the pregnancy was not forced, is before conception and not after. Upon conception, the child in its fetal form has independent rights.

Thus, the key issue is how are we to think of the embryo in the mother’s womb? At which point should a fetus be regarded as a human being with legal rights? To what extent should the law interfere with a woman’s right over her own body and to what extent should the law protect the rights of an unborn child?

Pro-choice groups argue that there must be a critical level of complexity in brain or nervous system development before the fetus can be regarded as a conscious personal agency. They decline to attribute personhood to the newly conceived embryo because it does not have capacity for thought, emotion or self awareness.

The fetus has yet to exist independently of the mother and thus cannot be regarded as a separate entity.

Some groups advocate a middle ground approach where abortions in the early part of the pregnancy should be permitted, but late-term abortion should be restricted.

However, those who are pro-life see conception as the decisive moment when human life begins. The fetus assumes personhood from the moment of fusion between the ovum and the sperm. A new individual is created with a distinct genetic identity.

However undeveloped the embryo may be, it is living and the life it possesses is human. As such, termination of pregnancy is also termination of a child’s life.

The innocent unborn is thus entitled to legal protection from deliberate destruction of life by another. The United Nations Declaration of the Rights of the Child 1959 declares that the child needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth.

In Malaysia, the 1989 amendment to the Penal Code widened the criteria for carrying out abortions. Before the amendments came into force, the only ground for abortion was “for the purpose of saving the life of the woman” (section 312).

Now, an abortion may be carried out if the medical practitioner is of the opinion, formed in good faith, that the continuation of the pregnancy would constitute a risk to the life of the pregnant woman or injury to the mental or physical health of the pregnant woman greater than if the pregnancy were terminated. This is a relaxation of the conditions for abortions to be legally performed in Malaysia.

The public debate in Malaysia has not reached the intensity it has in the US, where abortion is a hot button issue in every presidential election. However, it is time that we realise the significance of this debate.

Also, pro-choice and pro-life groups must find common ground and work together in reducing unwanted pregnancies.We must teach our young the sacredness of sexuality and the need to make responsible choices.

The decision to abort is often a wrenching emotional, physical and moral dilemma. As such, we must work hard to reduce the need to make such decisions in the first place.
For the record, I am pro-life simply for the reason that if abortion were permissible and my parents had chosen to abort me, I would not be writing this article.

The writer is a young lawyer. Putik Lada, or pepper buds in Malay, captures the spirit and intention of this column – a platform for young lawyers to articulate their views and aspirations about the law, justice and a civil society. For more information about the young lawyers, visit www.malaysianbar.org.my/nylc.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Hakim Bebaskan RPK Naik Pangkat




14 October 2009

(Harakah Daily) - Hakim Mahkamah Tinggi Shah Alam yang membebaskan Raja Petra Kamarudin dari tahanan ISA, Yang Arif Datuk Syed Ahmad Helmy, dinaikkan pangkat ke Mahkamah Rayuan.

Beliau menerima watikah perlantikan dari Yang Dipertuan Agung, Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin hari ini.

Syed Helmi dianggap sebagai hakim yang berani menukar undang-undang ketika beliau mengadili kes harbeus corpus Raja Petra yang ditahan di bawah ISA itu

Ini kerana, sebelum kes ini semua tahu Menteri Dalam Negeri boleh berbuat apa sahaja untuk menahan mana-mana pihak di bawah ISA dan tidak boleh dipersoalkan oleh mahkamah.

Namun, Yang Arif Syed Helmi telah menukar 'undang-undang' ini dengan berkata mahkamah berhak untuk menyemak adakah menteri melakukan sebarang kesalahan dalam melaksanakan kuasa yang diberikan kepadanya.

Penghakiman beliau ini telah disifatkan sebagai 'mengubah undang-undang' oleh seorang blogger dan penulis terkenal Art Harun dalam blognya.

Raja Petra dibebaskan kerana beliau didapati tidak menjejaskan keselamatan dalam negara dengan hanya menulis di dalam laman web.


Monday, October 5, 2009

H1N1 & Cervical Cancer Vaccines Not Entirely Harmless


Monday, 05 October 2009 11:59AM
©Malaysian Mirror

Recently, there has been some urgency by the Ministry of Health to purchase vaccines for the influenza A H1N1 pandemic, in view of the threat of a second phase.

While this move is with good intentions, it may be wise for the Ministry to proceed with caution as this Influenza A H1N1 vaccine is not entirely harmless.

The treatment must not be worse then the disease itself. If the flu virus A H1N1 remains as such, is there a need to mass vaccinate? Is it not better to maintain good health and personal hygiene.

Furthermore, vaccines prepared in a hurry may not have been well tested to make sure that it is safe enough. There is also the issue of the target virus, which at the moment is still not obvious, so that at the end of the day, the vaccines may not protect against the offending virus and may in fact give a false sense of security.

Already to date, there are more than 20 reported cases of resistance to H1N1 vaccines and this number is rising, especially in Australia, Denmark, Canada, United States, China and even across our shores in Singapore.

Most of the cases have occurred in people who were given the drug either to prevent infection after exposure to the virus or as treatment.

There are also many documented accounts of sides effects from flu vaccines. In 1976, Washington rushed in a mass immunization program against a similar swine flu outbreak that was confined to a single military base.

Several hundred cases of a rare, lethal, paralyzing neurological disease called Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) were reported afterwards from previous experience of mass vaccination as well as the Gulf War Syndrome.

Although the H1N1 vaccine now close to completion is different from the one used in 1976, the British Government’s Health Protection Agency said the earlier incident nevertheless highlighted a possible area of concern.

Similarly with the vaccine for cervical cancer. Though initial results with this vaccine is impressive in the reduction of pre-cancerous cervical lesions after three years of clinical trial, its long term side effects is yet unknown. One has to only google up HPV vaccine deaths to know of the short term risks present with mass immunization program.

At the same time, vaccinating 13 year olds in the prevention of a sexually transmitted disease has its social implications, not excluding promiscuity and a false sense of security, therefore indulging in more sex?

Is there a need to mass vaccinate 13year olds against pre-cervical cancer? Is it not better to improve cancer awareness and educate the females in the risk group to undergo the time-tried pap smear in the prevention of cancer of the cervix.

In any case, at the end of the day, it should the patient’s choice of how they wish to be treated or protected but as physicians, we must always remember, first do no harm.

Dr Ng Swee Choon
Medical Affairs Committee
Federation of Private Medical Practitioners Associations of Malaysia