Saturday, November 28, 2009
Nostalgia
Friday, November 20, 2009
Trouble In Iskandar
From The Malaysian Insider.
KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 — All is not well in Iskandar Malaysia, the country's showpiece economic corridor project.
Two chief executive officers of the Iskandar Regional Development Authority (IRDA) have not lasted two years on the job and there are now rumblings over the slow pace of progress from Middle East investors.
Apart from that, the relationship between some of the main players — the Johor Civil Service (JCS), Khazanah Nasional, Iskandar Investment Board (IIB) — leaves much to be desired.
He wants IRDA to come directly under the purview of the state government, and rely less on instructions from Khazanah Nasional, the federal sovereign wealth fund tasked with developing the economic zone named after the state Ruler.
The IRDA board is now jointly chaired by the Prime Minister and the MB but The Malaysian Insiderunderstands that the Johor MB could be assigned full chairmanship, giving him control of the regional authority.
Ghani has already started exerting his authority, much to the chagrin of the top brass in Khazanah Nasional. Late last month, he demanded the resignation of the incumbent CEO Harun Johari.
Officials at Khazanah Nasional wanted Harun to be given six more months on the job but last week, the IRDA board quickly accepted Harun's resignation. He will leave in January 2010 for IRDA to have another fresh start.
Harun, an ex-Shell stalwart, was hand-picked by Khazanah Nasional for the top position. He quickly brought in several of his former Shell colleagues to fill senior executive positions, and the organisation ballooned to over 150 staff under his charge.
His critics charged that he lacked charisma but his supporters argued that he is a process-driven individual who was effective behind the scenes. Harun replaced Datuk Ikmal Hijaz, the former Pos Malaysia CEO.
The latter was also hand-picked by Khazanah Nasional to drive IRDA and make it a world-class, one-stop centre for investors.
After being appointed, Ikmal also surrounded himself with several former colleagues from Pos Malaysia or the now defunct Renong Group, in which he oversaw the construction of the Gelang Patah crossing and massive land acquisition in Nusajaya.
The Malaysian Insider has learnt the new CEO of IRDA is Ismail Ibrahim. He is currently director of the National Physical Planning Division under the Urban and Rural Planning Department.
The Muar-born career public servant, who is a British-trained town planner, was among the pioneers assembled by Khazanah Nasional back in 2006 to draw up the Comprehensive Development Plan for the south Johor Economic Region (now known as Iskandar).
He later served as senior vice-president (Planning & Compliance) and became Johor's Federal Commissioner, but quit suddenly to return to the Housing and Local Government Ministry.
Ghani has already told Ismail that he expects an overhaul of the top management of IRDA, wanting him to rid the authority of deadwood.
At least four senior personnel are expected to be removed.
The JCS — a body whose support is necessary if any project is to take off in the southern state — has welcomed the appointment of Ismail.
Relations between the JCS and Khazanah Nasional have been uneasy since the inception of the project in 2006, with Johor civil servants complaining of being sidelined from the decision-making process. They have resented the fact that important decisions regarding Iskandar were being made in Kuala Lumpur.
The shortcomings in IRDA, and to a lesser extend IIB, come at a time when several of the Middle East investors are exhibiting signs of restlessness at the pace of the project.
Government officials told The Malaysian Insider that Khazanah Nasional was forced to buy back some land in Node 1 of Iskandar which it sold to a consortium of Middle East investors. This happened after some disagreement over responsibilities and obligations.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
You Got Robbed Because You Don't Love Cops
From Malaysian Insider, By Justin Ong
NOV 15 — Why do our politicians say the darnedest things? For instance, Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein was reported to have said that public vilification of government institutions is a factor contributing to the country’s rampant crime.
That’s Terminator-esque logic, that one; I’ll see if I can spell it out. Is Hishammuddin saying that our experience of being robbed, and the subsequent inability of the police to apprehend the bastards who robbed us, thereby leading us to think them (the police, not the thieving bastards) an irritatingly unhelpful bunch of twats, the reason why we were robbed again? If that is so: James Cameron, eat your heart out.
I’m a simple person. I like to see the reason why we have more crime as being down to the simple fact that we have more criminals. And the reason why we have more criminals is that the people responsible for catching these thieving bastards and locking them away aren’t doing so.
I can hardly see why my calling them all manner of names for not having done so contributes to their ability, or inability, to do so in the first place.
Or, perhaps, Hishammuddin means the way our police force has gained Gestapo-like imagery, replete with “mysterious” deaths in custody. Again, I’m a simple man. I cannot see how having such a frighteningly ferocious image can in any way contribute to an increase in crime rates.
I would have thought knowing that in the event you’re nicked for, let’s say stealing a car, that you’ll inexplicably drown in a glass of water while being held in police custody, would prove a sufficiently strong deterrent towards crime rather than providing further encouragement. But that’s just me. Who can fathom how the devious minds of criminals actually work?
Criminals of a more violent disposition (those naughty, naughty boys who like to play with knives and guns) would also no doubt tremble at the risk of engaging in “police shootouts” with the crack shots that populate our police force. Those who run afoul of this lot often tell no tales in the aftermath. Makes you think twice about leading a life of crime, doesn’t it?
As for white-collared criminals, the motivation to dip your hand into the cookie jar must be enough to make the earth move. Because the very real and present danger of having to negotiate the treacherously slippery window sills of Plaza Masalam for a breather during marathon questioning, should you be nicked with chocolate stains on your lips, bears serious contemplation.
Of course, all of the above are just some of the “perceptions” that the public may have of the various institutions.
But again, I put it to Hishammuddin: Do any of these actually create more crime? If anything, these make it obvious that the “perceived” stakes for criminals have gone up, not down. Why are people still breaking laws?
In any case, I’d like to offer some suggestions to Hishammuddin, on the premise that his assumption is true that it’s our lowly views of the government institutions that makes them ineffectual at their duties. At any rate, what’s there to lose?
Maybe you shouldn’t be sending 60 people to go arrest an unlicensed preacher. His name isn’t David Koresh, there is no Mount Carmel, and most certainly no automatic weapons are present. The same goes for opposition politicians, sending in siege teams is overkill.
Maybe you shouldn’t send an army of coppers to turn Ipoh into a warzone every time the bloody state assembly convenes. It’s a bunch of state assemblymen shouting at each other. What are you afraid of, that they’ll cuss each other to death?
Maybe you shouldn’t bother hauling up nutters cycling around the country to highlight social iniquities. While it’s alright to hate cyclists in general, even this was too much. Besides, they’re cycling in our weather; that’s already punishment enough.
Maybe you shouldn’t turn parks into battlefields every time a bunch of people want to get together and light a few candles, and maybe sing the national anthem. If they’re not crazy arsonists, your cops could be doing more useful things elsewhere. Plus, it’s good that people sing Negaraku, isn’t it?
Maybe you should have the MACC get its priorities right. Nobody is saying small graft is not graft. But between investigating the misuse of a couple of thousand ringgit in state funds and an unemployed dentist with a multi-million mansion, I think even you know which matter is the more pressing.
Maybe, just maybe, if all of these were so, you might be standing in Parliament and telling Malaysia how something is being done to make the country safe for one and all.
Because the alternative of going there and saying crime is high because we don’t think the world of government institutions, should be a crime in itself.
Monday, November 9, 2009
Launch Of PerlembagaanKu/ MyConstitution Campaign
Reports for the benefit of those who missed the launch:
A Different Kind Of Spirit And Intoxication
Prof Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi
Friday, November 6, 2009
10,000 Bibles Confiscated
Malaysia refuses to release Bibles which use banned word ‘Allah’
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
3 Dead Girls In 1Malaysia
What is this 1 Malaysia camp at Kuala Dipang in Perak? If not for that unfortunate death of the 3 girls, many of us wouldn’t know of this camp. How can the Government even consider sending kids as young as that age to camps, to teach about this concept called 1 Malaysia, which until now has not been explained to the people.
All I see with this so-called unity concept, is expensive billboards all over Kuala Lumpur put up by Government owned companies calling us to embrace this concept.
What is taught in these camps? Why are you teaching kids as young as 11 and 12 concepts, which are not even explained to their parents?
Please tell us what is 1 Malaysia, when we still have racial and religious discrimination in Malaysia perpetrated by the very Government calling for us to be 1?
A probe team was formed by the Education Ministry to investigate the broken bridge. But so far I don’t see any explanation by the Government as to what this camp is about and how it is that political agendas are being taught in our schools?
If this government insists on having these kinds of camps, then the Barisan government has no moral right to reprimand parents who take along their kids to peaceful demonstrations, like the recent one against the ISA.
Is it all right to try to brain-wash young Malaysians with unproven and unexplained concepts as part of a political agenda, like 1 Malaysia, but not all right for parents to bring along their kids for a peaceful protest in exercise of their fundamental liberty to assemble peacably?
It is of course always better to place the kids’ safety first, and people may question the wisdom of bringing kids to a demonstration knowing full well that the water-cannon-happy PDRM will not hesitate to shoot the water cannon at you.
On that logic, if taking kids along demos is not right, then how can taking kids to some boot-camp be right?
This incident at Kuala Dipang, has deepened the suspicion of Malaysians over the quality of Malaysia’s education system. Schools are supposed to teach kids about values and principles, not political agendas and unexplained concepts with some digit 1 on it.
So many questions, but no 1 clear answer.