Showing posts with label Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

The Son Najib Is Unlike The Father Tun Razak At All


"Remembering my father, Tun Razak" by Nazir Razak . Published by The Malaysian Insider on 14 January 2014.

Anything spent on it would have to come from public funds, and there was no way he was going to allow the state coffers to be depleted on something as frivolous as a swimming pool.

"What will the people think?" he thundered...

As the custodian of the nation's coffers, his frugality was legendary. "You had to account for every cent, or he would be on your back," one former minister told me.Well, I knew that already. Not just from the swimming pool episode, but many anecdotes.

My elder brothers often talk about one of the rare opportunities they had to accompany him on an official trip to Switzerland. He made sure he paid their expenses himself, he was so careful with the cost of the trip to the government that he moved his whole entourage to a cheaper hotel than originally booked, and they dined over and over again at the cheapest restaurant in the vicinity of the hotel.

And then there was his final trip to Europe in October 1975 for medical treatment. He must have known that it could well be his last trip, yet he did not allow my mother to accompany him to save his own money; probably concerned about her financial situation after his passing. She only managed to join him weeks later on the insistence of the cabinet and with a specially approved government budget for her travel.

His integrity was another trait that came up often in conversations. He was guided by what now seems a somewhat quaint and old-fashioned concept of public service; that a public servant is first and foremost a servant of the people whose trust must never be betrayed...

Many were later astonished to learn he had been suffering from leukaemia, given that when in office, he was constantly on the move, attending to official duties, immersing himself in the minutiae of policy and, of course, his famous surprise visits to constituencies around the country that allowed him to hear directly from the people about what was happening on the ground.

Of course, few people forget to recount Tun Razak's dedication to rural development. He was "People First", long before the sound bite.

But above all, what they unanimously emphasised was Tun Razak's commitment to national unity – towards building a nation where every single one of its citizens could find a place under the Malaysian sun. That vision was encapsulated in the two initiatives that my father spearheaded in the wake of the May 13, 1969 tragedy – the formulation of the Rukunegara in 1970 and the New Economic Policy in 1971. The Rukunegara reconciled indigenous cultural traditions and heritage with the demands of a modern, secular state.

The NEP's goal, as outlined in the policy announcement, was the promotion of national unity to be undertaken via a massive experiment in socio-economic engineering through the twin thrusts of eradication of poverty irrespective of race and economic restructuring to eliminate identification of economic function with ethnicity.

The debate on the NEP rages on today. I myself have publicly remarked that something has gone awry in its implementation. The fixation on quotas and the seemingly easy route to unimaginable wealth for a select few have created an intra-ethnic divide in class and status, while fuelling inter-ethnic tensions. Both these developments serve to undermine, if not completely negate, the overarching goal of Tun Razak's NEP, strengthening national unity.

What went wrong? Some have argued that the fault was affirmative action itself.  For me, it was because its implementation was skewed by the focus on the tactical approach rather than the commitment to the strategic goal. The NEP has certainly helped eradicate poverty and reduced economic imbalances by spawning a Malay middle class.

However, in terms of the larger vision, the best that can be said about the NEP is that it initially helped blunt the edges of racial conflict in the aftermath of May 13. Thanks in part to the NEP, Malaysia did not follow Sri Lanka, which became embroiled in decades of strife between the immigrant Tamils and the indigenous Sinhalese.

That is no small achievement. But the NEP promise of strengthening national unity has not been realised. In fact, there are signs that inter-ethnic and intra-ethnic tensions are once again approaching worrying levels. What can be done? There is a Malay proverb: "Sesat di Hujung Jalan, Balik ke-Pangkal Jalan." Loosely translated, it means "When one has lost one's way, one should return to the beginning."

And "the beginning" here, in my view, is the values, commitment, vision and inclusiveness demonstrated and embodied by Tun Razak. I have mentioned earlier the remarks about his integrity, commitment to the concept of public service and his vision of a progressive, prosperous and united Malaysia. But let me close here by emphasising two other highlights of his legacy.

One, he was a true democrat. Two years after running the country as head of the National Operations Council, he disbanded the committee and restored democratic rule. He held virtually dictatorial power as the NOC chief, but his worldview and values rested on a foundation of democratic rule, not dictatorship. His decision-making style exemplified this as well: he brought in all who needed to be involved and engaged in a consultative discussion before any major decision was adopted. He never excluded those with contrarian views, he encouraged multiplicity of opinions in order to have the best chance of making a right final decision.

Two, while he was committed to helping improve the material quality of life for the majority Bumiputeras to avert another "May 13", he viewed this as a national prerogative rather than a racial one. That, to me, explains his determination to involve Malaysia's best and brightest in this quest, regardless of their racial or ethnic origin.

Just check out those who served him and his administration back then. They were and are, Malaysians all, united in their determination to rebuild this nation from the ashes of May 13. That was Tun Razak's legacy to Malaysia. We can best honour it by returning to "Pangkal Jalan".

Read more here:


"Malaysia’s Najib Faces Party, Public Protest" 

published by The Asia Sentinel on 13 January 2014.


Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak enters 2014 beset by growing hostility from both the public and within his own political party, the United Malays National Organization, characterized by a deluge of New Year messages across cyberspace celebrating the “year of barang naik,” Malay language for rising prices of items.

That is a play on the initials BN, for Barisan Nasional, the national ruling coalition. It has become an opposition battle cry to the point where Najib mentioned it himself in a recent speech

Najib is making an astute move now, after national and intraparty elections have been completed, taking on the necessary but unappetizing task of dismantling decades of subsidies that have driven government debt close to the statutory limit of 55 percent of gross domestic product. In the wake of both sets of elections, he is temporarily invulnerable to both opposition and intraparty assaults.

However, electricity tariffs have risen by 15 percent, sugar subsidies have been cut. Last September, Petronas, the national energy company, cut fuel subsidies in a move that it said would save the government RMB1 billion annually. Public anger at the cutting of the subsidies is substantial and growing.

In addition, many in the party rank and file are still furious over widespread spending to keep the current leadership in place in the September intraparty elections.

That has brought the prime minister under unprecedented attack from bloggers aligned with the wing of the party controlled by former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, who are delivering an extraordinary onslaught on his lifestyle and that of his wife, even going so far as an unprecedented call for attention to corruption within UMNO itself. The attacks had been expected from the time Najib blocked Mahathir’s son, Mukhriz, from becoming one of the party’s three vice presidents in the September polls.

Najib has sought to deflect criticism, saying the price hikes have been caused by factors such as the global economy and extreme weather that cut into the fish catch and drove up the price of vegetables. The government has also sought to spread the pain by cutting government ministers’ allowances by 10 percent, banning civil servants from business class flights, restricting expenses on official government functions. However, that hasn't mollified voters, who staged public protests over New Year’s.

Najib also enraged voters by leaving for most of the holidays, going to Las Vegas and other watering holes with his wife, Rosmah Mansor, whose free-spending ways have alienated large swaths of the conservative Malay Muslim community. He is being called “Mr Nowhere” because of his absences from the country.

“A putsch is in the air, definitely, as the frustration with Najib's free spending and extravagant lifestyle increases,” a Malay businessman told Asia Sentinel. “Najib is in the weakest position any prime minister in Malaysia has ever seen.”

Calls have been rising to have Mohamad come back to the government administrative center of Putra Jaya as an “adviser” to right the ship, something that appears highly unlikely. Mahathir himself made light of the idea.

In the meantime, bloggers who have been described as aligned with Mahathir have been raising their game, making broadly based attacks on Najib and even other UMNO officials, calling attention to what appears to be corruption in the award of highway contracts.

Kadir Jasin, a former New Straits Times editor and close longtime Mahathir ally, wrote recently that “To many UMNO leaders, the measure of the party’s success is big cars, big houses and expensive watches whose names they can’t even mention.”  In particular, Rosmah has been criticized repeatedly for her taste in vastly expensive watches.

Kadir also called attention to “people with no formal appointments and duties (who) are known to use government on pretext of serving the country,” an apparent reference to Rosmah’s November commandeering of an official government jet to fly to Qatar to attend an international forum.

“Do they know that even the Queen (of England) uses trains and charters planes when travelling overseas? They should because many like the PM studied in the UK. Air transport for the British Royal Family and the government of the UK is provided, depending on circumstances and availability, by a variety of military and civilian operators. But most often they fly using scheduled commercial flights, normally the British Airways.”

“We are complaining about the wrong things he is doing in accommodating the wishes of his wife,” Kadir wrote. “We are asking the government to be accountable. The PM should answer these allegations. The way he bragged about his wife in public, he was in fact saying that his wife has more influence than him with foreign leaders.”

“Outsyedthebox” suggested that Najib, who had never finished his economics degree, actually “imbibed from the “Proton school of management” (the money-losing national car) “where it is a good thing to buy something high and sell it low.  Or buy something high and then sell it even higher to people who have few options.: 

“Mahathir’s and (former Finance Minister Daim Zainuddin’s) hands are all over the place but the point is that Najib and his wife are providing all the ammo,” a source said. “Without the ammo, Mahathir would be hard pressed to rally his troops against Najib.”

Everything “down to the price of ice has increased in a manner of two weeks,” said another UMNO loyalist. “Everything in Malaysia shot up in one month without notice. The government keeps the ringgit so weak against the US dollar, the cost of living keeps bouncing, salary increases are nothing. Crime is up, corruption is up. People are getting really upset.”

During the waning days of the premiership of Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, as the rank and file sought to push him out, “similar contempt was restricted to some segments of UMNO and the ruling elite,” a source told Asia Sentinel. “With Mahathir, it was disgust and contempt from intellectuals and rights groups. But with Najib – it's across the board and it extends to his wife and friends.”

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

Malaysians Seen Curbing Spending as Living Costs Surge: Economy


By Chong Pooi Koon. Published by Bloomberg News on 7 January 2014.

Millions of middle-class Malaysians are grappling with the biggest increase in state controlled electricity and gasoline costs since 2008, threatening consumer spending growth and reasserting the country’s reliance on exports this year.

Since winning a May election, Prime Minister Najib Razak has unleashed a series of price increases to cut subsidies and improve state finances, crimping scope for companies to boost wages while spurring inflation. The moves, from a 14 percent jump in sugar costs in October to an 11 percent increase for gasoline in September and an average 15 percent to 16.9 percent climb for electricity this month, could slow private consumption growth by 0.9 percentage point in 2014, according to Alliance Financial Group Bhd. and Malaysian Rating Corp.

“Definitely it’s difficult,” Ng Wei Keong, a project engineer with two children aged 5 and 3, said in an interview at a December protest against another strain on his living cost -- an increase in the annual property assessment rate in Kuala Lumpur. “My kids will be without toys, no more vacation, no new cars and we must be very wise on spending money.”

Malaysia’s middle class, forged during the economic boom of the early 1990s, is bearing the brunt of the fiscal trimming as they grapple with a cocktail of record-high property prices, elevated household borrowings, and slower pay increases than lower-income earners. Rebounding exports are set to counter the spending squeeze, giving Najib scope to put consumers through the immediate pain of surging living costs as he shifts the economy toward market-based prices for commodities and energy.

‘Some Pain’

“There will be some pain in moving towards market-based pricing of the currently subsidized-costs of essential food items, fuel and energy,” said Suhaimi Ilias, chief economist at Maybank Investment Bank, part of the country’s largest lender. “Over the long term the economy will gain from a generally more efficient economy.”

Underscoring the threat to the domestic demand that held up growth in the past two years as exports faltered, consumer confidence in the third quarter fell to the weakest since 2009, according to a Malaysian Institute of Economic Research measure. An index of consumer stocks barely rose in the second half of 2013, gaining 0.02 percent compared with the benchmark’s 5.2 percent climb.

The “headwinds to domestic demand in the near term” would make Malaysia’s economic growth increasingly dependent on an export recovery, Citigroup Inc. said in a November report. The banking group predicts a 5 percent expansion in 2014, at the lower end of the government’s forecast range, as it anticipates more fuel price increases that will cut discretionary incomes by a net 2 billion ringgit ($608 million), or 0.2 percentage point of nominal gross domestic product.

Sandwich Class

Those in the middle-income group, who make as little as 3,000 ringgit a month, don’t benefit as much as other segments from planned government handouts or income tax cuts, said Wan Saiful Wan Jan, chief executive officer at the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs, a Kuala Lumpur-based think tank.

Malaysian families who earn 3,000 ringgit to 4,999 ringgit a month made up 27.8 percent of households in the population of about 30 million, according to government data for 2012, up from 4 percent in 1989. About 39 percent of households fall below that bracket, while the remainder of the middle class and the highest income groups -- those earning 5,000 ringgit and above - - account for 33.6 percent.

Inflation Pressure

“The bottom 40 percent is helped by the various welfare programs, while the top 5 percent will benefit from the trend to reduce income tax and they are generally better off in a liberalizing economy,” Wan Saiful said in an interview. “For the middle income group, nothing has been done to help them but there are so many things that they can’t afford anymore.”

Inflation in Southeast Asia’s No. 3 economy may accelerate to 2.9 percent this year and a seven-year high of 3.3 percent in 2015, when Najib plans to introduce a new consumption tax, according to Bloomberg surveys. In contrast, the Malaysian Employers Federation estimates lower salary increases and bonuses in 2014 in the private sector as business costs rise.

“The faster inflation rate amid slower income rise erodes purchasing power, which will impact the consumer spending part of GDP,” said Maybank’s Suhaimi. He predicts the central bank will keep interest rates unchanged even as inflation reaches 3.5 percent in 2014, to avoid further deflating consumer sentiment. “The risk to growth is pretty much coming from consumers.”

Pay Increases

Executives will get a 5.63 percent average increase in salaries, down from 6.31 percent in 2013, and non-executives will get a 5.65 percent raise from 6.7 last year, according to an MEF survey of 257 companies. Lower-paid workers will fare better -- in addition to benefiting from a minimum wage, non-executives will get a bigger bonus this year while executives will get a smaller payout.

Government data show that the most well educated people in the workforce got the smallest wage increase in the two years through 2012.

“What we earn cannot cope with the rising cost of living,” said Selena Tay, a freelance writer in her 40s who lives with and supports her elderly parents. She plans to cut out purchases of clothes, shoes, bags to save money for food. “The government is strangling us. We are now scared to read the daily newspaper because every day, the price of something is going up.”

Political Gamble

Najib is making a political gamble as he starts to dismantle decades of subsidies to address fiscal risks identified by Fitch Ratings, which cut Malaysia’s credit outlook in July. Within months of the May election that returned his ruling Barisan Nasional coalition to power without winning the popular vote for the first time, he scrapped the sugar subsidy and unveiled plans for a goods and services tax at the risk of further alienating the urban voters who turned against him.

The next election is due by about mid-2018. Najib’s predecessor Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who introduced even bigger increases in electricity and fuel prices after the 2008 general election, stepped down to make way for Najib mid-term in early 2009.

Forty-nine percent of respondents in a survey released in December say the country is heading in the wrong direction, with rising living costs and unfavorable economic conditions cited as the main reasons, according to the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research.

Some Malaysians have already taken to public protests against the price increases. In December, hundreds gathered in front of the city council office in Kuala Lumpur to rally against an increase in property taxes. On New Year’s Eve, about 4,000 people joined an illegal protest in the capital to demand lower living costs, disrupting a countdown concert, Bernama reported.

“My biggest worry is, financial difficulty will lead to ethnic tension,” said Wan Saiful. “You go to a Malay area in Kuala Lumpur, Kampung Baru or Sentul, you already get the sentiment that they are accusing the Chinese of taking away all their economic wealth. If you go to poorer Chinese area in Cheras, Balakong, the sentiment you’ll get is the ethnic Chinese will say of course they are poor, because the ethnic Malays are the ones being helped by the government.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Chong Pooi Koon in Kuala Lumpur at pchong17@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Stephanie Phang at sphang@bloomberg.net

Monday, November 19, 2012

Prime Minister signed ASEAN’s first human rights declaration (AHRD) in Cambodia



By Clara Chooi. Published by The Malaysian Insider on 18 November 2012.

Today’s signing, which took place during the 21st ASEAN Summit at the Peace Palace in the capital city of Phnom Penh, comes at an opportune time for Malaysia and the Barisan Nasional (BN) government led by Najib, which has come under close international scrutiny for its alleged mishandling of several recent human rights issues.

“ASEAN shall pursue the protection and promotion of human rights in the region in our own way and also try to maintain the highest standard as expressed in various declarations and instruments of the international community,” ASEAN secretary-general Surin Pitsuwan was quoted as saying in The Star Online.

According to media reports, the AHRD has a total of 40 clauses and covers areas like civil and political rights, economic, social ad cultural rights, developmental processes and peace enhancement. The declaration also states that the rights of women, children, elderly and disabled persons and migrant workers are integral and indivisible part of human rights and fundamental freedom, The Star reported.

Najib has found himself in the international spotlight on numerous occasions, taking the hit for his administration’s alleged heavy-handedness in dealing with matters concerning civil freedom, individual rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association.

Some key examples include the widespread crackdown on two pro-democracy rallies held by electoral reform movement Bersih 2.0 — one on July 9, 2011, and another on April 28 this year — which resulted in scene of chaos and violence on the streets of this usually peaceful capital city.

To dull the uproar, however, Najib has taken great pains to improve civil liberties in Malaysia, even agreeing to repeal the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA) and the Sedition Act, enacting a new law to regulate public gatherings, agreeing to allow student participation in politics and relaxing provisions in laws governing press freedom.

But after the last protest on April 28, foreign media reports predicted that the government’s handling of the event would likely undermine Najib’s image as a reformist and force the prime minister to delay the next general election.

Several newswires, picked up by major newspapers globally, also took the same stance, with Reuters reporting that police action raised “the risk of a political backlash that could delay national polls which had been expected as early as June.”

Agence France-Presse also said that “the rally poses a dilemma for Najib, who since last year’s crackdown has sought to portray himself as a reformer, launching a campaign to repeal authoritarian laws in a bid to create what he called ‘the greatest democracy’.”

Several reports pointed to the first Bersih rally held just months before the March 2008 elections, which saw BN record its worst electoral performance ever, ceding its customary two-thirds supermajority in Parliament and five state governments.

Najib took over from Tun Abdullah Badawi a year later, ostensibly to improve on the results and some observers say only a return to two-thirds majority will guarantee he remains Umno president.

Widespread condemnation from the international press of Putrajaya’s crack down on last July’s Bersih rally saw Najib announce a raft of reforms including a parliamentary select committee on electoral reforms and the Peaceful Assembly Act, a major concession to win back an alienated middle-class.

But the findings of a bipartisan panel have been criticised as cosmetic by civil society and the opposition and yesterday’s planned sit-in was the first major test of the new law regulating demonstrations the BN chief says abides by “international norms”.

The foreign press had at the time also widely carried global civil liberties watchdog Human Rights Watch’s criticism of the government, saying it showed “contempt for its people’s basic rights and freedoms.”

“Despite all the talk of ‘reform’ over the past year, we’re seeing a repeat of repressive actions by a government that does not hesitate to use force when it feels its prerogatives are challenged,” said Phil Robertson, its deputy Asia director.

Apart from Bersih, the BN administration has also earned itself international condemnation for bringing charges of sexual misconduct and sodomy against Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim numerous occasions, a move that the leader’s supporters have claimed was merely to stifle his campaign to topple the ruling pact.

Several cases of deaths in custody over the past few years had also cast the government in the spotlight for alleged human rights abuses. One example is the death of DAP political aide Teoh Beng Hock, whose death, which occurred while he was under the care of anti-graft officials, has continued to haunt the government since 2009.
Link:

Deeply flawed ASEAN Human Rights Declaration must be postponed

In a letter sent today to ASEAN Heads of State, the ICJ and other leading international human rights organizations called for the postponement of the adoption of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. The groups are pointing out that in its current form, the Declaration falls short of existing international human rights standards and risks creating a sub-standard level of human rights protection in the region.

Of particular concern are the General Principles in the Declaration. Under General Principles 6,7, and 8 of the current draft, enjoyment of rights is to be “balanced with the performance of duties”, subjected to “national and regional contexts” and to considerations of “different cultural, religious and historical backgrounds.” Also, all the rights in the Declaration may be restricted on a wide array of grounds including “national security” and “public morality”.


Friday, April 3, 2009

He could have been 'Father of Freedom'

The Sun (Fri, 03 Apr 2009) 

PETALING JAYA (April 2, 2009) : Many Malaysians would probably still remember that Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was known as Mr Nice Guy long before he was sworn in as prime minister on Oct 31, 2003.


Abdullah waves to Mindef staff.



















He is still a very nice man but having been drawn into survival politics --- and all that it entails in the Malaysia context --- many are probably wondering whether he is still the same Mr Nice Guy they knew before he moved into Seri Perdana.

It is difficult not to be charmed by Abdullah. His smile is most disarming and his commonplace remarks often put those who meet him at ease almost immediately.

A journalist who works for a foreign newspaper, who had several unpleasant encounters with the autocratic Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, was bowled over by the "work with me, and not for me" call that Abdullah made just a day after being sworn in.

After Abdullah made the pledge in Parliament a few days later to put an end to corruption in the government and to uphold democracy, the journalist exulted "this is the prime minister for me!" loudly during a dinner with fellow scribes.

And after Abdullah made that surprise visit to the Immigration Department a fortnight later and told those manning counters that they should provide good service and cause less inconvenience to the public, he was most effusive in his praise for the prime minister, even though it was the only such visit.

He was estatic when Abdullah attended a Christmas reception at the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Brickfields where he announced that he is the "prime minister of all Malaysians."

It was one of his missed opportunities. Abdullah could have built on that to promote genuine racial integration.

Most Malaysian voters were delighted to receive a letter from Abdullah sent to their home addresses advising them to be careful when they drive home to vote in the 2004 general election and telling them that they must exercise their right to vote.

But a few months after the general election, the journalist, like other Malaysians, was noticed to be less enraptured by Abdullah, especially after his new cabinet was more or less a re-hash of the old one that he had inherited and was doing little to root out corruption.

When Abdullah did not tick off those who waved the keris, those who made ketuanan Melayu a new war cry or moderate the call for the extension of the new economic policy, the journalist was back being his old cynical self.

Most Malaysians were delighted when Abdullah --- to the horrors of some of his ministers --- declared he was all for a more open society and invited them, especially members of the Barisan Nasional, to tell him the truth.

Those in the media were overwhelmed, especially after Mahathir had in his 22-year rule tightened laws governing publishing, printing and broadcasting to such an extent that government’s control was near absolute.

If only Abdullah had amended some of the laws to allow the media to at least have recourse to the courts over some of the unjust decisions of the government, he could have been hailed as the "Father of Freedom."

Even though he did not do that, there is no doubt that the openness that he declared gave way to more open discussions on matters that were discouraged previously. But it also brought problems --- perhaps as a result of poor management --- to his administration.

So far it has not been heard by what appellation he would be known considering all his predecessors were given popular names. Tunku Abdul Rahman was "Bapa Merdeka" or "Bapa Malaysia", Tun Abdul Razak Hussein was "Bapa Pembangunan", Tun Hussein Onn was "Bapa Perpaduan" and Mahathir was "Bapa Pemodenan".

Abdullah, the nature of the man that he is, had a lot of good intentions when he was prime minister but it was unfortunate that he was unable to press on with many of the more meaningful initiatives that he started when the challenge to them became strong.

Often, he would go back on his words, so much so that much of his six years as prime minister was characterized by numerous U-turns.

One glaring example is the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission or IPCMC which was recommended by the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysian Police.

Had it been implemented as recommended, which he promised it would, Malaysia would have one of the best police forces in the world. He would go down in history as the man who had dared to go where others had failed to tread.

Even on Islam Hadhari, a pet project which he genuinely believe would lead Muslims in the country to become more progressive like those who lived during the Golden Age of Islam where they were free to innovate and experiment, he was challenged at every turn.

Instead of supporting and helping him, most religious leaders and mosque officials continued to preach the restrictive form of the religion that frowns on innovation and progressive thought.

He is sad that Islam Hadhari is given a cold shoulder in the country when it is accepted by other countries like Indonesia and those in the middle east, he told newspaper editors when he had lunch with them on Tuesday.

He should have known that "a prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and his house".